tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-43603223048821823572024-03-22T04:51:00.200+00:00Campaign for an English Parliament - West MidlandsNews blog for the West Midlands branch of the Campaign for an English ParliamentCEP Webmasterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09309556247769114504noreply@blogger.comBlogger138125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-67321719977232438832016-07-31T14:54:00.000+01:002016-07-31T15:02:57.855+01:00Won and Lost?The failure of not having a PM from the Vote Leave camp flies in the face of democracy and could be a disaster for us thanks to that Worsal Gummage character Boris Johnson. His comic character combined with his work effort would have fooled anybody, let alone us and his fellow Brexiteers. He had us all believing he had abandoned the Vote Remain camp and that aside about seeing an out vote only as a means to go back to the EU for a better deal, how wrong we were. He convinced 17m of us Vote Leave supporters and I believe his fellow Brexiteers that he was 100% behind the campaign and would be standing for election if Vote Leave won. I see no other explanation why the only other creditable candidate M. Gove should have kept ruling himself out during the campaign and then at the last minute had to put himself forward after realising like us he had been duped. By standing down Boris handed Vote Remain the crown and the power to send the true Bexiteers to the guillotine, and for it he has been rewarded with his dream job of Foreign Secretary. It appears the “All For one, one for all” cry of the musketeers didn’t apply to the Brexiteers, just the opposite in fact.<br />
<br />
With the Labour party split widening, in one way it would have been a catastrophe if it had happened to the Tories, but if the new PM thinks she can fudge an EU deal she can expect a rebellion.
The one thing to be thankful for is that she is of English stock and did not go north of the border like the last one did to quote her Scottish credentials. She chose instead to show a bit of the British Bulldog spirit and put a muzzle on that yapping Scottish Terrier, informing her no doubt that Scotland is still part of the United Kingdom and subject to the laws of UK devolution, and as such Scotland has no legal right to go it alone in deciding the British constitution.<br />
<br />
Brexit, the result of the referendum, must mean Brexit; it is the last chance we have of taking any steps to save our islands and England’s unity. While we are in the EU its open border, multicultural and regional policies will continue to drive our four nations apart, and let’s not forget; unlike our other three nations England does not have the protection of a parliament to defend its nation’s homeland assets and cultural identity. The English votes for English Laws policy being pushed by the previous Cameron government was and is not good enough to defend England’s unity against the divide and rule regional policies.
England is the homeland of the English just as much as Scotland is the homeland of the Scots and it must be given a parliament to recognise that fact. Our laws and culture must be paramount like theirs is, and every foreigner intending to settle here should be made aware of that fact through our education system. Why should Scotland and Wales be allowed to use a system of integration while England suffers from multicultural disintegration? The prospect of which could see England being balkanised into separate cultural regions which always ends in catastrophe. We should be shouting from the roof tops that we have had enough of this and this political correct clap trap that is making us bow down to foreign domination, it is the betrayal of all who died and fought for England since time immemorial, and our fathers killed in the last two world wars, some buried in cemeteries over seas in countries were their families can not afford to visit. Let’s not forget too that all these people that are coming here have their cultures being sustained in other parts of the world you don’t. If Brexit means Brexit we should recreate a New Federal Britain, one that gives equality and recognition to all four nations or five if Southern Ireland decided to join in.<br />
<br />
<br />
PS
If you don’t think England is being taken for a ride by the Labour Party because it doesn’t have its own parliament please consider this;
When G. Brown was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, we had a person that had been elected an MP by the people of Scotland only, a country that already had its own separate parliament full of MSPs. The English could neither vote for him or against him, and all the while he was in office he was passing laws on England that did not apply and he could not pass onto the people and country that elected him. Besides which he and his fellow Scots had signed on oath, a declaration that said they would put Scotland’s interests before that of any other nation, which still applies today.<br />
<br />
<br />
This English hating Labour party now proposes to try and stick the knife in the English again, only this time using a Welshman by the name of Owen Smith who they have selected to oust J. Corbyn. This is another person from another country with its own parliament, another person not accountable to one English voter, another person who will take pleasure in passing laws on us English that will not apply to his own people that elected him. Just how far we are going to let these English hating MPs go before we get them deselected and thrown out.
We need an English parliament now; by accepting and promoting a British identity we have connived in a plot to destroy ourselves.
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-72143898444339711402016-07-11T16:07:00.002+01:002016-07-11T16:19:07.271+01:00The Pantomime goes on
How many more Acts and Scenes are there going to be in this House of Commons pantomime, it appears the plot thickens every week as more and more MPs join the cast and are eager to show off there newly acquired acting ability, or lack of it depending on your view. With Walt Disney’s Alice in Wonderland politics still holding sway at PM’s Question Time, in the back ground we are seeing adventures into Game of Thrones, House of Cards and William Shakespeare, all round, it appears to be taking the shape of a plot designed for Midsomer Murders.
The Cameron Cuckoo has been the first to get the chop, after being the first PM for 20 years to be elected the leader of a true Conservative government he has lasted for just 1 year, perhaps he should have listened to and not ignored the Swivel Eyed Loons that he was told supported him. Like the Cuckoo he came to the fore in April, with the air and grace of an Arthur Daley type second hand car salesman making outrageous claims on the referendum, sings the song in May and plays the same tune in the middle of June and then when it all goes wrong he’s flying away.
Meanwhile the Corbyn Mad Hatter elected to office by its party members only 12 months ago now finds its self at odds with its party’s elected parliamentary MPs who have given it a vote of no confidence. These MPs are supported no less by the Cuckoo, who after booking his own flight out tells parliament he wants the Mad Hatter to join him, presumably for a trip to Fantasy Island. Let’s hope they take a lot of their own ilk of useless depressing decrepit fear mongering MPs with them and follow the path of that famous Oozium bird, so that the country can begin to regain a much needed
confidence.
Unfortunately that is not the end of the pantomime as the scene now moves to the campaign itself and how things panned out. Throughout the campaign the conservatives were constantly stressing how their party would still be united with their Brexiteers after the referendum, which makes you wonder. Since the majority of the leaders of the Leave campaign were conservatives and almost all are now supporting a remainer for PM, could these people have been part of a Tory plot to stop UKIP taking the prominent position of opposition. If they did then unfortunately the result still went badly wrong for the remainers because the main players forgot to tell their wives of the plot, and when they got involved things turned rather nasty and personal and some of the actors were then forced to take their parts seriously.
The result of the referendum has proved the old saying; you can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time.
Even after spending billions of pounds over the last 20 years denying the existence of our nation, and even though these none patriots tried to rig the vote by extending the voting deadline, and even though they spent £9million of public money on propaganda leaflets, called on the support some think through blackmail of big business and wealthy organisations, have infested not only the House of Commons but every public and political institution in England, and even though they try to transform our homeland into taking on the mantle of a British colony, English common sense proved too much and democracy won the day, or as it.
After the constant reference being made by Vote Remain during the referendum that anybody voting for Brexit was thick, and referred to by the derogatory term “Little Englander” it is surely now obvious to the English or at least it should be that over 75% of the present HOC has no respect for you or your nation. These people have always been in denial of the democratic right of the English to have to their own parliament, and they must now be full of venom that England has not given them the result they wanted.
We must not count our chickens before they are hatched, if you are English and a member of the conservative party I urge you to think carefully before casting your vote, and remember, until Article 50 is signed by the PM the uncertainty of direction could bring about the calamity the remainers forecast and give them the excuse to try and change the result.
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-74603981935948370992016-05-29T12:17:00.000+01:002016-05-29T12:17:36.606+01:00POSTER TO COPY AND USE <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="https://img1.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 5.0pt; margin-left: -9.0pt; margin-right: -9.0pt; margin-top: 5.0pt; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 72.0pt;">VOTE LEAVE</span><span style="font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 20.0pt;"></span></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 5.0pt; margin-left: -9.0pt; margin-right: -9.0pt; margin-top: 5.0pt; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">WE </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">ARE</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">
INDEBTED TO </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">ALL</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;"> OF OUR
ANCESTORS, ESPECIALLY THOSE POOR SOLES WHO LOST THEIR LIVES IN THE LAST
TWO WORLD WARS, </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">AND</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;"> WARS SINCE,
FOR FIGHTING FOR </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">AND</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;"> TO
DEFEND THE RIGHT OF OUR PEOPLE TO LIVE IN AN INDEPENDENT, </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">FREE</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;"> </span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">AND</span><span style="color: red; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 28.0pt;">
DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY UNDER OUR OWN RULE OF LAW.</span><span style="color: red; font-size: 22.0pt;"></span></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;">ARE</span><span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;"> YOU
GOING TO BE A JUDAS </span><span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;">AND</span><span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;"> SELL</span><span style="color: blue; font-size: 22.0pt;"></span></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;">OUR HOMELAND </span><span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;">AND</span><span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;"> THEIR
LIVES FOR 30 PIECES OF SILVER</span><span style="color: blue; font-size: 22.0pt;"></span></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 22.0pt;">HOPE NOT</span></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 48.0pt;">ON 23<sup>RD</sup> JUNE</span></div>
<div align="center" style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "arial rounded mt bold"; font-size: 72.0pt;">VOTE LEAVE</span><span style="font-size: 72.0pt;"></span></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-63220553629786328912016-04-04T21:33:00.001+01:002016-04-04T21:33:44.920+01:00It's a Full House<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026"/>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/>
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is interesting to note that in Korea
and Japan a Turkey
is seen to be a bird of more than one face, and this is reflected in the names they
have given it, a Chilmyeonjo and Shichimencho respectively. This description
could easily apply to the majority of MPs in our parliament who continually show
one face to the public when they are trying to get elected and another when
they have been. It goes without saying that if Turkeys
got the vote they wouldn’t vote for Christmas, so it comes as no surprise when the
chancellor looked for cuts for his budget he looked everywhere else except in the
Turkey coop. Perhaps
he should remember that there is a stocking density for Turkeys
and it is an issue when it comes to their welfare, over stocking leads to
aggressive behaviour and violent encounters.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ever since implementing the requirements of EU regional
policies in 1998 we have seen an explosion in the government of the United
Kingdom and the cost must now be enormous to
what it was prior to devolution. We now have four separate parliaments were
once we had only one, all full of MPs of every description and all supported
with increases in their own civil services, and all being paid huge amounts of
money, yet we have seen no reduction of MPs in the British Parliament to match.
The Turkey Farm has been growing and it’s been growing at England’s
expense, and while the Turkeys
are getting fat the English pheasants are queuing at food banks, and all the
time the old and disabled wondering how long it will be before the Turkeys
stop them getting there by removing their bus passes and benefits. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Joining the EU has been catastrophic for the English, economically,
politically, and culturally, for now the English have to subsidise the upkeep of
not only all of these extra national parliaments at home, but also those of less
well off countries in the EU. At the same time the English are being denied a national
parliament of their own which is allowing the British to downgrade their nation
to immigrant status in their own homeland. In order to save British power and the
jobs of British MPs that would have to be lost if England gained a parliament,
the government supported by EU policies <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"></span>of
multiculturalism is trying to destroy England’s unified state with the creation
of British multicultural regions. It is now seen has a terrible sin if any area
across England
is predominantly English, and school teachers are being encouraged to downgrade
the teaching of English culture and values as the country gradually takes up
the appearance of a European colony. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
UK’s
three other nations have their own MPs and representatives to defend their
culture, and successive governments have hived off responsibility for their
domestic affairs to them. Besides there being no reduction in British MPs in
the UK parliament there has been no reduction in their salaries either, on the
contrary they have been given increases far above the national average and now
have so much less to do and more time to do it that they are getting bored, so now
take longer holidays and other jobs. The best fed Turkeys are the British MPs
elected from the devolved nations to serve in the UK parliament, these people
have even less to do and can spend their time plotting against England and looking
after their own nation’s interest. They have hardly if any constituent
responsibility because that has been passed to an MP in their own country’s parliament,
yet the British government is paying these MPs the same money as those elected
by us in England
who have. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
When did you last here of any British MP we elected complaining,
or complaining about the fact that we in England can’t chose them, elect them
or get rid of them, and can like recently vote against England, this time to
stop the control of Sunday trading rules being passed to our local councils. The
only complaints we here from most of those British MPs who are supposed to be
representing England are complaints about the introduction of the English votes
for English Law policy which they say creates two types of MP, why they think
we don’t have that now shows how much our education standards have fallen. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It is a serious matter when over 40% of the work previously
done by the UK
parliament has been passed to the minor nations and there has not been a major
cut in British MPs or their salaries. Besides losing this work the UK
parliament has also lost at the lowest estimate 50% of its law making powers to
the EU, most of which are now introduced by ministers with little or no parliamentary
debate. Why too are the Turkeys being allowed to keep increasing the numbers of
people in the House of Lords next door, and being allowed to continue using it
as a retirement home for their friends and family, both from here and abroad,
it’s diminishing the house impartiality? Not to mention another created load of
MEPs who swan off on day trips to Europe everyday at our
expense, pretending they are defending UK
interests, for sure they don’t even pretend they are making an attempt to
defend England’s.
No wonder the majority of British MPs want to remain in the EU, under EU
management they have never had it so good, and if its left to them it wont be
long before they use the EU multicultural policies to create another lot of
little regional Turkey farm parliaments across England, which rather than
increasing democracy diminishes it. When they say we are all in it together
they are talking to their like, they are not talking about the publics
suffering under austerity, they are talking about the EU gravy train they are
all taking part in.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
There needs a major constitutional change in the UK and it’s not one that should be left to an undemocratic EU. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>J. Stanhope <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>West Midlands Campaign
for an English Parliament</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-76436042980264316762016-03-05T13:45:00.000+00:002016-03-05T13:46:29.518+00:00A Reformed United Kingdom<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A
Reformed </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">United Kingdom</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>NOT</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Lies and Deceit of a Reformed European
Union</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">On </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">the
3<sup>rd</sup> of September 1939</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> the last time there was a serious threat to so
much of </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">England</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">’s sovereignty from a European
power; MP Mr. L.S. Amery stood up in the House of Commons and said “SPEAK FOR
ENGLAND” Prime Minister.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>How different the House of Commons now, the
British have given away so much power to the EU their MPs have been able to
take up acting careers, and getting very good at it too unfortunately. Even Prime
Ministers question time is now akin to a scene from a Walt Disney pantomime, full
of characters who would qualify for the Monster Raving Loony party, and all taking
our money and pretending they still make our laws of government. With one side
of the House in Wonderland and the other in cuckoo land, no wonder everybody is
confused on </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Europe</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> and can’t make head or tail of
what’s going on, and that’s the whole point. In the latest scene of this
pantomime the Cuckoo has found out it’s his supporters known as the
“Swivel-Eyed Loons” who are responsible for him and his party getting elected,
so he tells his ministers to ignore them as he intends making them all redundant.
Meanwhile with the country’s independence on a knife edge and whole of </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Europe</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> in chaos and about to explode, the
Mad Hatter decides to miss his party’s campaign on </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Europe</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> day to attend a CND rally. Before this
Tea Party atmosphere on the EU referendum gets out of hand and the rest of the Cuckoo’s
ministers leave the nest, I think the Mad Hatter should pull the Rabbit out of
the hat and put </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Alice</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">’s question to the Cuckoo. (“ I have a question here from Alice in
Wonderland, she would like to know if before you fly away in June would you
allow anybody in the House to “Speak for England”)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">These none
patriots over the years have infested not only the House of Commons but every
public and political institution in </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">England</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">. They are continually using their
positions of power to brainwash us and our children into a multicultural EU
ideology, with the intent of concealing the true intensions of what is becoming
a German dominated </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Europe</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">. With lies and deceit of euro scepticism these people have gained our
support to get elected to positions in high office, even to become leaders of
political parties and win general elections. It is only now when the survival
of our nation’s sovereignty rests on a knife edge, we are becoming aware that behind
this mask of scepticism lurk the Europhile soldiers of a </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Brussels</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> front. A </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Europe</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> built on lies and deceit will be
recognised no matter how many spies, spy cameras and guardianistas they have to
protect it, and it will not last. With their give up a little freedom for a
little security policies too, it makes you wonder if an attempt is being made
by these people to turn </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">England</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> into a European open prison.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">We must act
in our own interests and must ignore all the lies and scaremongering that is
about to come from these people who want to destroy our nation. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">A vote to leave will give us back our freedom,
our democracy, our independence, our ability to act in our best interests and
live again by the laws we create, not laws forced upon us against our will by an
undemocratic foreign power. Are the English young and old today going to throw
away all of the sacrifices made by their ancestors since time immemorial, more
than a million in the last two world wars alone, for and in defence of that
freedom and democracy, as it all been in vain. David Cameron says the young
should tell their grannies to vote to stay in, I say their grannies should tell
the young the constitutional history of the English that is being denied them, and
they would not need to tell them to vote leave they would be fighting to get to
the ballot box.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">There is going to be no reformed European
Union, there can’t be, because all of the treaties and laws being signed up to are
needed to succeed in the ultimate aim of the EU of becoming a one nation state.
A vote to remain will lead to the UK having to put its opt outs of the four
most important areas in which we now have a veto to majority voting, and I
can’t see the rest of Europe agreeing that we keep them. I can’t see a British
government either of any of the main political parties agreeing to give us
another referendum, so this will be the last chance the English have of saving
their nation. The four opt outs to be handed over to </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Brussels</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> control will be;</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 21.0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 21.0pt; text-align: justify; text-indent: -18.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">(1)<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Schengen – open borders, asylum, immigration
</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 21.0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 21.0pt; text-align: justify; text-indent: -18.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">(2)<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Economic and Monetary </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Union</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>the EURO</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 21.0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 21.0pt; text-align: justify; text-indent: -18.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">(3)<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Charter of Fundamental Rights </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 21.0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 21.0pt; text-align: justify; text-indent: -18.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">(4)<span style="font: 7.0pt "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Area of Freedom, Security and
Justice</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">If the British want to hang on to these opt
outs and don’t want to be part of the one state European project like they say,
then why is PM David Cameron leading the remain to stay in campaign, is he not
telling us the truth or is he truly Cuckoo. Surely if we want a Common Market
existence with the EU we should vote to leave and negotiate one. (No there is
no reformed EU)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">If David Cameron believed that the </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">United Kingdom</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> faced Armageddon, the impression he
gives if we vote to leave the EU, it beggars the question why he gave the
referendum in the first place unless he truly is Cuckoo. (No he didn’t have to)</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>How much
better if we vote to leave, regain our democracy, and in the interim period of
leaving we set about making plans for a reformed </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">United Kingdom</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> of the four nation states. Each
having their own separate parliaments of equal powers, (the English remaining
in </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">London</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">) set up in system agreeable to all.
Maybe consider a new British Parliament built for the twenty first century in
the North, with a new international airport and transport system, to really
make an area north of the </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Watford</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> gap the power house the Conservatives keep talking about.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Not long ago we saw the Scots waving their
claim of right, the English need to start waving a claim of right of their own,
demand their own parliament and stop Europe turning England their homeland into
a European colony now before it is to late.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>J. Stanhope</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"></span></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-68824524434194479512015-09-20T18:08:00.000+01:002015-09-22T12:43:59.387+01:00WHO HAS ALL THE POWER NOT THE PEOPLE<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
<div class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
From
time to time especially in times of crisis we have had to consider regional
government of the U.K. but not one of these schemes involved the national
government giving up its responsibility for governing the country, and no one
could ever have envisaged a government<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>surrendering that responsibility voluntarily to a foreign power. This
has been happening in ever increasing proportions since Devolution 1998 because
of the support given by the entire main stream political parties to the
implementation of EU regional policies, which they know if followed through to
their conclusion will see the break up of our nation state. The introduction of
regional devolution and its effect on national government is seen more
prominently when it is pointed out that Scotland and Wales although nations
within the UK are in fact recognised regions of the EU, and because of this
it’s Brussels, not the UK government that decides and rules over 80% of the laws
on which their government base their domestic policies. These Laws and rules
allow our regions to introduce policies of discrimination against one another
at home in the UK but not against other regions outside in Europe, imagine
England balkanised into the suggested EU regions without an English parliament
to protect it, it will be game set and match to Europe and goodbye to England’s
unity forever as regions fight each other to establish their own identities, a
text book case for divide and rule within the United Kingdom. The truth is not
being told, these EU laws do apply equally to England’s
local government, and you can’t assume anymore that those applying and managing
England’s laws
are still making them, they are not, and they can’t bend them either for fear
of enormous law suits and fines from the EU. These laws are so rigid that they
are being rubber stamped into law by UK government ministers using Enabling
Acts and Statutory Instruments, and since they may not under any circumstances
be changed, amended, altered, or repealed in any way, so they get very little and
most often no debate at all in the UK parliament. Most important is the fact
that once power is devolved from national government to regions the power to
govern them is passed to the EU, and once devolved to the EU it can not be
taken back no more than you can take devolved powers back from Scotland
and Wales. England’s
regionalisation is a keystone, although it won’t be admitted in the EU’s long
term plan to stop us acting as an independent nation. EU official papers make
no reference to England
at all only the regions of it, and the proposed city regions deceitfully being
introduced under the combined authority banner is the first step in doing just
that. Devolution / decentralisation within England
is not national devolution as granted to Wales
and Scotland
nor should it be so regarded, England
has no parliament and no political recognition neither in the United
Kingdom nor the EU. What these protagonists
for regionalism fail to tell the public is that what they are proposing for England
is going to take the country back more than a thousand years to a time of England’s
dismemberment, and internal conflict. Devolution in reality has come to mean
the power to administer according to strict directives and laws, most of which
are decided and enforced by the EU and it will be the responsibility of city
mayors to see that these are adhered to, and if local businesses think they can
get preferential treatment they should think again because they can’t.
Europhiles want to create these regions ASAP before England wakes up and starts
demanding its own parliament to defend itself, because they know if they can be
established before March 2017 when the UK government loses its veto over 43 of
the most important areas of self government to Qualified Majority Voting (we
are in the transition period of the Lisbon Treaty which started from 1<sup>st</sup>
November 2014) then it will be almost impossible whatever government gets in to
disband them. We need an EP. ASAP not regions and will David Cameron call the
referendum before March 2017? It should include a vote for an English
Parliament. </div>
<div align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; text-align: center;">
J.Stanhope. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>West
Mid Campaign for an English Parliament</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<br /></div>
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]--><h2>
</h2>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-19079771623014945382015-08-04T13:16:00.000+01:002015-08-04T13:18:54.554+01:00Scots starting to rattle a few cages<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">While media attention has
been focused on </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Greece</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> and the budget little attention has been given to the arrival in the
House of Commons of the Scottish National Party. Free from the pressure and
power of British party whips, the Scots are already starting to rattle the
cages of the establishment, and it will soon become obvious if it has not
already that the Scots will only be British when it suits them.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The British must have known when they gave </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> a devolved parliament in 1998 they were violating the
‘All for one, one for all, One Nation, One Parliament’, basic principle of the </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Union</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">,
yet they put their heads in the sand to its consequences. They have been lucky to
avoid these consequences since devolution only because of the power the British
political party’s have held in </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Now that British power in </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> is in the hands of the nationalists the Scottish pigeons
can truly come home to roost, and from what we have seen so far they are
clearly not going to sit back quietly and feast on the gifts of the referendum.
The Scots have done the English a favour here and exposed how the democratic
imbalance of devolution is enabling all of the national parliaments, not just
Scotland; to interfere in English domestic affairs, and much of the time it can
be seen to be to their own country’s advantage, hence the proposal by the Conservative
party to introduce an ‘English Votes for English Laws’ (EVEL) policy in the
House of Commons. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The one thing outstanding
from the debates so far in the </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">HOC</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> on this
policy is that EVEL is going to be unworkable unless the three nations, </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> in particular play ball.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The democratic imbalance in </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Britain</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> goes far beyond the introduction of EVEL and the
denial of a parliament for </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">; it is a systematic attempt to write </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> out of the political story. Without a parliament </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> has no political voice.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Despite having these parliaments </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">, </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Wales</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">, and </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">N.
Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> still retain ministers
in the cabinet, and each has a separate select committee, grand committee, and </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">BBC</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> TV station, all solely dedicated to their own affairs. Lets not forget either a tax funded grant given to these nations based on an outdated formula called Barnett that gives Scotland 10.66% Wales 6.02% and N.Ireland 2.87% of any money the British spend on England; at present gifting Scotland alone an amount equiverlent to over £1600 per head of population more than England. What can England do about it? nothing, What does </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> have? absolutely nothing, and the ‘Better Together’
British cabal that only twelve months ago fought to keep Scotland in the Union
are now promoting a ‘Better in Bits’ policy on England, and instead of backing
this up by recognising England and its nation with a parliament they are trying
to introduce an EVEL policy on the </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">HOC</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> that if nothing else admits that the UK parliament is now not fit for
purpose.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>J. Stanhope</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span></span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">West Midlands</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Campaign for an English Parliament </span></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-83552399159619211512015-01-15T22:33:00.001+00:002015-01-15T22:33:39.982+00:00What the British political parties must be made to talk about<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Why are the media getting into
a sweat about David Cameron refusing to take part in any political leader’s
debates on TV if it doesn’t include The Green party, when the more important
question they should be asking is why is the leader of the Scottish National
Party being ignored.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">According
to the latest polling figures for the upcoming General Election in May the
Scottish National Party (SNP) are on course to become the majority political
party representing </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> at </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Westminster</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">. Faced with what appears to be more than a
possibility the SNP after May could see itself not only being in control of the
Scottish Parliament but being the third largest party in the whole of the
United Kingdom, and more importantly it would be in the enviable position of being
able to put pressure on any prospective UK government, even to the point of
making a British political party include them in any coalition. Whether in a
coalition or not the SNP could make it nigh on impossible or extremely
difficult to say the least for any British Political Party to govern one half
of the kingdom without their help. Facing the prospect of a Scottish national
party passing laws on England doesn’t bear thinking about so why can’t the media
and the so called English party the Conservatives see this, and why is this
party having second thoughts on their English Votes for English Laws policy
while giving this Scottish national party more power? The English have looked
at the last 16years of devolution and the Barnett Formula as bribery by the
British to keep </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> in the Union, but is there any British political
party now thinking the unthinkable and willing to offer a Scottish national
party English government.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The
question needs to be asked, will there be a </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Union</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">
a </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">United
Kingdom</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">
after May’s election or not, and if so what sort of </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">United Kingdom</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> will it be if the British do lose their power in </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> to the SNP?</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">This
is the most important Question to be put forward in any debate and D. Cameron
and E. Milliband must be made to answer it.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>J.Stanhope</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>C</span></div>
<br /><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right: -18.0pt;">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-74814175667776415252014-11-13T22:21:00.001+00:002014-11-28T16:25:14.625+00:00 England Better Together than Regions Apart<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> watched how all the main political parties stuck
together in mass to support the independence no vote in the Scottish referendum.
They virtually got on their hands and knees as they begged, pleaded, and yes
even cried to woo the Scottish electorate. Unbelievably, they allowed Gordon
Brown the self appointed ex Prime Minister and a Scotsman; the man mainly
responsible for the “Scottish claim of Right “ </span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TSxGuNrc2vg&NR=1">ttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TSxGuNrc2vg&NR=1 </a>that led us to this situation, offer
the Scots terms of agreement for a no vote that has sent shock waves through
the UK constitution.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">How differently these parties
reacted when the Scots accepted this agreement, no mass support from them for </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> to receive anything like this devolution settlement. One
party though the Conservative thought a consideration was necessary after they
thought the offer had highlighted how </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> was being treated unfairly. It is surprising that any
political party noticed this when you consider that England has been treated
unfairly by all the main stream political parties since New Labour’s devolution
program of 1998, and have all been constructive in denying the political and
constitutional existence of England and an English identity, the implications
of which have led to the English question. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">The English don’t believe these
political parties through self interest have any intension of tending to </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">’s grievances with anything like the vigor they fought
for </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Scotland</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">’s. Already the conservative party has selected Graham
Allen an MP known not to support an English Parliament to chair their House of
Commons Political and Constitutional Committee looking into the situation.
Until British MP’s accept that there are four indigenous Nations on these islands
not three, that each one needs to be treated equally and fairly there can be no
sustainable union.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">Any talk of regional
government in any form by any political party or politicians without first
giving </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> and the English nation national recognition should be
fought against if </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;"> is to survive. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">In the latest slight on our
English identity </span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span><span style="font-size: 14.0pt;">’s rugby team has to suppress a patriotic film rallying
support for the side due to fears of political ramifications. Stuart Lancaster
the side’s head coach said that at a private viewing some of the audience who
watched the film was in tears.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-53778731460867653802014-08-10T12:52:00.001+01:002014-08-10T12:52:55.254+01:00Campaign Update<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<!--[if !mso]><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png" style="background-color: #b2b2b2; " class="BLOGGER-object-element tr_noresize tr_placeholder" id="ieooui" data-original-id="ieooui" />
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal" style="margin-left: 252.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT"; font-size: 9.0pt;">
</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">We
approach our campaigning with grim determination and have made considerable
inroads into the British Establishment and with the referendum on Scottish
independence coming up in September we need to keep the pressure on. Below is a
summary of the achievements and events of the last year and hope that you will
consider the CEP a worthwhile campaign to which to subscribe. </span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonospacing">
<b><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Our
activities over the years have produced the following results:</span></b></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonospacing" style="margin-left: 36.0pt;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Symbol;">·</span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 7.0pt;"> </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Because of the oral and written evidence we
gave the McKay Commission, the Commissioners went beyond their sole remit to <span style="color: #23262a;">propose a procedural device at </span></span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Westminster</span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. They further stated that
only an ‘all-England’ solution is acceptable, agreed that </span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> needed a voice, rejected
regional assemblies or localism as English devolution and stated that the
political parties must produce manifestos for </span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">In addition to calling for an
English Parliament these were precisely the additional requirements that we
made in our evidence.</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonospacing" style="margin-left: 36.0pt;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Symbol;">·</span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 7.0pt;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Secondly all the articles now
being written by correspondents, columnists and journalists about the
Constitution not only draw heavily on the articles, leaflets, booklets and
pamphlets that we have circulated and published but lift whole sentences and
paragraphs from what we have been publishing over the years. The fact that they
do not have the courtesy to acknowledge us is not down to any lack on our part.
</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonospacing" style="margin-left: 36.0pt;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Symbol;">·</span><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 7.0pt;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Thirdly our Campaign Director,
Eddie Bone, is now frequently invited on to the British broadcast media for his
opinion on the current state of the constitution. He was interviewed alongside
Plaid Cymru's Leanne Woods and the Ulster Unionist Mike Nesbit by Dermot
Murnaghan on Sky News in January. This is clearly a step forward from when only
the pop artist Billy Bragg was invited to comment on English matters.</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Some events and activities that we have been involved in during
the last year and anticipated:</span></b></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">We
continually meet and lobby <span style="color: black;">MPs. Consequently</span>
our third 'Future of England' event took place in the House of Lords last
November. Frank Field MP, Lord Maclennan, Frank Field MP, Professor
Richard Wyn Jones and Eddie Bone, who had appeared on two </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">BBC</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> Politics programmes that day, spoke. Our
annual open meeting, when we met members and discussed activities, was on the
same day<strong><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT"; font-weight: normal;">. </span></strong> In January we demonstrated and leafletted in
Portsmouth about the political decision to sacrifice jobs in the historic
shipyards in favour of retaining those in Scotland and flew a banner inviting
the Mayor, who described herself as Welsh and therefore not responsible for
English affairs, to resign. We have give written evidence to the House of
Lords Constitution Committee inquiry on Scottish independence: constitutional
implications for the rest of the </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">UK</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">.</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal" style="margin-left: 36.0pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Labour and Trades Union events we have attended are</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> antagonistic to us and refer to ‘salami
slicing’ </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> to divide and weaken us without the public
noticing. They intend to bribe city councils by expanding city regions
but to keep this policy quiet until the next election manifesto is
published. At a </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">London</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> event on a UK Constitutional Convention it was clear that the
speakers and organisers did not intend us in </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> to be treated as one nation. At a
Conservative Party conference t<span style="color: black;">here was a debate on
the </span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">UK</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">, which comprised </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">representatives from the devolved countries
but none from </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">! Currently UKIP have no policy on the
governance of </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> although<span style="color: black;"> </span>Nigel
Farage has publicly supported the creation of an English Parliament and <span style="color: black;">we </span>had stalls and an oversubscribed fringe event at
the September UKIP conference. </span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">The
Coalition parties appointed members of the <span style="color: black;">McKay
Commission whose</span> <span style="color: #333333;">title and remit excluded ‘</span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">’ and addressed only the House
of Commons viewpoint.</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> The <span style="color: #333333;">5 man Commission was set up with a majority of members
from the devolved nations and none to represent </span></span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">.</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> <span style="color: black;">Their </span><span style="color: #333333;">report, which </span><span style="color: #23262a;">redefined
the West Lothian Question as the English Question, </span><span style="color: #333333;">is insufficient</span><span style="color: #23262a;"> for
us. However, once we have some form of EVEOL, territorial classification of
bills and English manifestos, the people of </span></span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> are likely to press for
further changes. Once </span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> has a voice it will be
impossible and very unwise to ignore it. Articles in the press, using the
arguments we put forward ten years ago, illustrate why EVOEL will not
work. The next step is to prove that the only equitable and workable
answer is an English Parliament.</span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">We have kept our voice within the English question debate by
issuing press releases constantly and writing to all political journalists and
Universities’ political departments asking for a debate on the position of </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> in a devolved </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">UK</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. The Census, The Mckay
commission, Think Tank and newspaper reports of the Coalition's attempts to
answer the English Question have helped our issues move up the political agenda
and gain academic acceptance. </span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Last
year NC members have <span style="color: black;">given numerous radio and TV
interviews in </span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Our campaign has been reported in <span style="color: black;">Prospect
magazine but, s</span>hamefully only with the imminence of the Scottish referendum
have major British media been interested in our views. The Huffington
Post, a </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">US</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> news website, includes our articles but
makes them difficult to find. The editors of the New Statesman and
Country Life are antagonistic to our campaign. <span style="color: black;">Eddie
Bone attended an academic conference in </span></span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Cardiff</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> on the effects of the Scottish
referendum and was pleased with the response to our campaign. He also
attended a conference in </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Manchester</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> about our changing </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Union</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> and also </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">Dundee</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">University</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. </span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="color: #23262a; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">The CEP battlewagon does turn heads, it gets a friendly honk or
the thumbs up!</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";"> </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">It attends many events and gatherings<span style="background: white; color: black;">.</span><span style="color: black;"> </span>Would
you like to organise a meeting near you for us to attend with it and a
continuous PowerPoint presentation showing the effect devolution has had on </span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">England</span><span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">? T<span style="color: black;">o speak to the
team please ring 0845 6346108 or email </span><a href="mailto:info@thecep.org.uk" target="_blank">campaigns@thecep.org.uk</a><span style="color: black;">. </span></span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">We have a professional quality camera so we can make films and
broadcast interviews; to date with Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Paul Salveson and
Jim Hancock (campaigning for a 'Northern' Parliament) and CEP members'
testimonials. We need donations to defray the cost of camera and sound
equipment. To raise some of the funds necessary to expand our campaign we
have signed up to <u><a href="http://www.easyfundraising.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.easyfundraising.org.uk</a></u>.
When you buy online at participating stores, at the standard price, a
proportion will be credited to our bank account. Please register and use
this way to help us to continue our campaign. If every member could
recruit one new member then our income would double! You could also join
the 100 club. It costs just £10 annually to join and cash prizes (value
depends on numbers of members) are drawn 5 times a year at every NC meeting,
except the </span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">AGM</span><span style="color: black; font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">. </span></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="yiv7033172558msonormal" style="margin-bottom: 6.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Gill Sans MT";">We cannot keep up this level of activity
without the commitment of members so you see a regular contribution both
personally and financially would be greatly appreciated.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-82885281846885996152014-03-24T12:27:00.003+00:002014-03-24T12:52:15.648+00:00Dairy Crest Response<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaA3esN_MVCWn0qXLwKOTlg9owgktE_M-WxRyEOuKDphnCnhY9jB82R34dt9QoIedDOLYOfDM7jFtxo_LaBQW5eF2p5C1j9reeNco4aKAicOJ0uHNIQgClxezuOQwEqoW-5i4_jH9G5Ss/s1600-h/10_17_1.JPEG"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgaA3esN_MVCWn0qXLwKOTlg9owgktE_M-WxRyEOuKDphnCnhY9jB82R34dt9QoIedDOLYOfDM7jFtxo_LaBQW5eF2p5C1j9reeNco4aKAicOJ0uHNIQgClxezuOQwEqoW-5i4_jH9G5Ss/s400/10_17_1.JPEG" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5258087514563975250" style="cursor: hand; float: right; margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<div>
Call me Dave has hired a Looby Loo shrink to run psychometric tests on MP’s, the Campaign for an English Parliament suggests that Dairy Crest do the same and run a similar test on its PR and advertising departments. Perhaps both will then come to the same conclusion and realise that these people can only fool all of the people some of the time, and not all of the people all of the time.<br />
We have had a reply from Dairy Crest on our complaint about the changing of identity of their Country Life butter product, from its original English Label to a British Label, and they tell us that people have requested this?<br />
No they have not, when this company with its French interests recently acquired 100% of the Country Life Label they could not wait to shove it in our English faces and have been determined to ignore its English connection.<br />
We have asked who these people are? and pointed out to them that we too had asked the people, in two Mori polls, one ICM poll, and a BBC poll across England, and these had shown that 68% of the population of our country wanted to be identified with England and yet they ignored them.<br />
They also tell us that there have been no changes in the manufacturing process, admitting the two products are identical, which virtually proves this to be a case of deliberate discrimination and amounts to racism against England. It is also unbelievable that Dairy Crest thinks there is no racism when they state in their annual report that they are the sole suppliers of milk to Marks & Spencer, and boast too, that all of their organic milk comes from farms in the West Country, yet Marks & Spencer can identify its milk source with England and the Cross of St. George, and the company that supplies it can’t. Marks and Spencer and their customers should sue this company for misrepresentation, and is again another sign of British racism and English discrimination.<br />
Dairy Crest racism if not stopped will spread across other British companies and we advise all the people of England to think seriously about purchasing this companies products.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Down at the pub Marge says what we all think of Dairy Crest’s replies<br />
from their stooges.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hj0VosOd4A">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hj0VosOd4A</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div>
Fight against British Racism - Fight against English and England's Discrimination </div>
</div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-47259189820902008842014-03-18T16:38:00.002+00:002014-03-18T16:38:44.467+00:00What could be England's Last Wake up Call<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
When Margaret Thatcher was ousted by
Europhiles for defending the United Kingdom against the introduction of EU
regional policies proposed in the Maastricht Treaty, (subsequently signed by
her successor) the signal was given to the EU that the United Kingdom was going
to be a willing partner in sharing and relinquishing power to them, and accepted
the possibility it could lead to the destabilisation of the nation state. <st1:country-region>Britain</st1:country-region>
in Margaret Thatcher lost its last true British patriot.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
Successive British governments and
parliaments in their rush for <st1:place>Europe</st1:place> have corrupted the
British identity with these regional policies, so much so that you could
actually say they have encouraged it to the extent that <st1:country-region>Scotland</st1:country-region>
and <st1:country-region>Wales</st1:country-region> now appear
to want no more part of it. Given the power to look after their own domestic
affairs with national parliament’s and doing so successively is it very
surprising that they keep coming back for more power, and one of them, Scotland,
now wants the option in a referendum to breakaway and decide its own future.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
<st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
has been kept in the dark since 1998 from the reality of adopting these EU
regional policies and it is only now when the end of the <st1:country-region>United
Kingdom</st1:country-region> could be in sight that the English
are beginning to wake up. When in 1998 New Labour introduced these EU regional
policies they did so by using our national boundaries and a process called
asymmetrical devolution which denied <st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
its rightful recognition, and it gave all other <st1:country-region>UK</st1:country-region>
constituent nations except <st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
a parliament. For the first time in 300 years the separate nations of the <st1:country-region>UK</st1:country-region>
were given the power to discriminate against each other, and <st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
without a parliament was not and is still not able to fight back. We have seen
the results of discrimination manifest themselves in the differing costs of
student fees, access to prescription drugs, care for the elderly etc, etc, each
time the cost being to the disadvantage of the English tax payer. It also made
it impossible anymore for British political party’s to put out a manifesto that
would apply across the whole of the <st1:country-region>UK</st1:country-region>,
and although they try to make it appear so by calling one British they can’t
mask their separate manifestos for <st1:country-region>Scotland</st1:country-region>
and <st1:country-region>Wales</st1:country-region>. How
long can the United Kingdom survive in its present form anyway when certain parts
get better benefits than others, and English rights to those benefits are denied
by British MP’s, over 100 of whom are from
Scotland and Wales whose countries it is that get them. We must not forget either
why the British have to deny England its political existence, it’s so that they
can use it as a cash cow to bolster their own identity at home and abroad, and
how hypocritical then that they are spending billions of pounds of our money
doing it while at the same time they have continued to sign over their identity
to Europe. If the British had any intention of saving the last of their empire
they would have been talking to all of the <st1:country-region>UK</st1:country-region>
nations about federalism before and after signing <st1:city>Maastricht</st1:city>
and at least before any Scottish referendum that could signal the end of it.
The importance of <st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
gaining a parliament to protect itself and its assets in the circumstances can
not be over stressed; if <st1:country-region>Scotland</st1:country-region>
becomes independent the <st1:place>British Empire</st1:place> will be over. (<st1:stockticker>FACT</st1:stockticker>)
If the British after want to retain their now defunct UK identity and power
over England by denying us a parliament they will have to make us in England
take on all of Scotland’s UK debts, which could put a debt of between £20,000
and £30,000 on the head of every English tax payer. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
It will be a sad and costly day for us
all if Scotland brings the United Kingdom to an end, and let us remember the <st1:stockticker>FACT</st1:stockticker>
that the separate kingdoms were those of England and Scotland which became one
in 1707 and that Wales and Ireland played no part in it. (<st1:country-region>Wales</st1:country-region>
had been part of <st1:country-region>England</st1:country-region>
since 1536)<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
Most of all let us not forget that none
of this could have come about if the New Labour Blair government had not
repealed all of the Treason Acts from 1770 onwards from British Law.<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 9.0pt; margin-right: .15pt; margin-top: 0cm;">
<o:p> STANO</o:p></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-60446719979515576042014-02-20T16:29:00.000+00:002014-02-20T16:29:21.004+00:00IS GATS DICTATING ENGLAND’S DOMESTIC POLICIES<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">Ignored by
British Devolution Policies England is out on a limb when it comes to defending
itself against the threat of Corporate Globalisation. The General Agreement on
Trade in Services (GATS) treaty signed by World Trade Organisation (WTO)
countries is liberalising services within nation states and England without
representation has had no voice to prevent the nation’s assets being opened up
to multinational companies for exploitation. Under this agreement members have
to state what they will enter under GATS and what in other member states they
would like to see liberalised; it is about time the people of England were told
what requests of liberalisation has been made on our country and its Domestic
Policies by other WTO members and what the UK British Government made on other
countries. It has been said that over 150 service sectors could be opened up to
competition including education, health and postal services which we know
already have, and according to reports the </span><st1:country-region><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">US</span></st1:place></st1:country-region><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;"> has predictably made sweeping
demands. What appears on the outset to have been a merely trade agreement is
becoming anything but, and from all appearances it now seems to be an agreement
to allow rich multinational companies to move in on all of our country’s assets.
It’s not been long ago since we heard that the British Government was proposing
to sell off </span><st1:country-region><st1:place><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">England</span></st1:place></st1:country-region><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14.0pt;">’s forests, so the question is, has
the government decided these options or were they decided for them because of
the said so called free trade agreement? Without its own parliament it is only England
that has no voice and separate representation when these agreements are drawn
up, and it’s about time the English realised this fact before this green and
pleasant land of ours is ours no more. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-21397653637898423722012-05-09T14:40:00.002+01:002012-05-09T14:40:32.135+01:00BBC Racism shames British Political PartiesLast week the BBC said they thought the Words English and British were irritating so they preferred to promote Scotland and Scottish. This week we find the BBC is going one step further in showing their contempt for England and the English by starting to use a system that lets them award contracts to companies that would guarantee to employ staff from Scotland at the expense of English staff who they would replace.<br />
<br />
<br />
It has been reported in the Times that English members of the crew producing the world snooker championship in Sheffield for the BBC lost their jobs because they came from England. Under a system introduced by the BBC that favoured staff being employed from North of the Border the company IMG was forced under breach of contract to employ people from Scotland. Workers from Scotland were sent to England and put up in hotels while specialists who had produced the two week tournament for several years were told they could not have the work. Apparently the BBC also used to employ local students as runners to make tea etc. but the company is now bringing down people from Scotland and paying in turn for them to stay in expensive hotel rooms.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
This is an utter disgrace and had it have been the other way round Alex would be banging on the door of No 10 Downing Street <br />
<br />stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-6997234146080311332012-05-03T10:38:00.000+01:002012-05-03T11:09:19.435+01:00BBC Complaint Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363While listening to Formula One on 5 live one of our members got fed up with the presenter emphasising the nationality of the driver Di Resta because Scotland and “the Scot” was screamed out every time Di Resta passed, but Button and Hamilton’s English identity was never mentioned once during the broadcast. On occasions he referred to them as the “Brits” the racist remark made against us English by the British to deny us our identity. The member complained to the BBC and pointed out the fact that if the United Kingdom still existed which the British keep telling us the English it does, then aren’t all the people of that Kingdom supposed to be “Brits” ;if the BBC and their presenters think not then that is up to them, but it is racist of the BBC and their presenters to deny one nation of that Kingdom their separate identity while recognising the other during any broadcasts.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Here is the e-mailed replies <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dear Mr JUSTICE<br />
<br />
> Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363<br />
<br />
> Thanks for contacting us about 5 Live Formula One<br />
<br />
broadcast on BBC Radio 5 live on 22 April.<br />
<br />
> I understand you felt it was biased of James Allen to refer to Paul di<br />
<br />
Resta as 'Scottish' several times yet fail to use the terms 'British' or<br />
<br />
'English' in reference to drivers such as Lewis Hamilton and Jenson<br />
<br />
Button.<br />
<br />
> As listeners can be irritated by the use of 'English' or 'British', we<br />
<br />
try to keep this to a minimum. Morever, we can assure you that there is<br />
<br />
no anti-English agenda at the BBC.<br />
<br />
> However, I appreciate your frustration that you felt James Allen was<br />
<br />
biased against the use of the terms 'English' and 'British' and so<br />
<br />
please be assured your complaint will be added to our audience log, a<br />
<br />
daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC<br />
<br />
staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers<br />
<br />
and other senior managers.<br />
<br />
> The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape<br />
<br />
decisions about future programming and content.<br />
<br />
> Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.<br />
<br />
> Kind Regards<br />
<br />
> Ryan Burroughs<br />
<br />
> BBC Complaints<br />
<br />
> www.bbc.co.uk/complaints<br />
<br />
NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored.<br />
<br />
You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact<br />
<br />
us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dear Mr Burroughs<br />
<br />
> Thank you for your reply about "5 Formula One" and James Allen's bias<br />
<br />
towards England .<br />
<br />
> I am afraid your statement that listeners can be irritated by using<br />
<br />
English or British says it all, my guess it would be about the word<br />
<br />
English that is the rub!<br />
<br />
> WHAT listeners are irritated by the word English?? So any other<br />
<br />
national name can be mentioned without fear or favour, the mind boggles.<br />
<br />
> If this is a fact and your listeners are so upset by England being<br />
<br />
mentioned a warning should be given before each program that words may<br />
<br />
be used to upset the listener,<br />
<br />
> If you had sent a letter like this to any other nationality but an<br />
<br />
Englishman you would have had a "ism" case on your hands.<br />
<br />
> This Englishman is not amused and it confirms every thing I have<br />
<br />
thought about the BBC for years.<br />
<br />
> Regards<br />
<br />
> Henry Justice<br />
<br />
We ask all our members to complain to all media sources that are trying to deny us our identity<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-32661790545573090672011-08-14T14:03:00.001+01:002011-08-16T22:08:54.703+01:00English RiotsOver the last few days the people of England have seen a recently discredited and corrupted British police force stand by and leave English businesses in nearly all of their major cities including England’s capital city London to the mercy of rampaging mobs. Forced by the police to stand by and watch as their businesses and homes were ransacked and set on fire the English were reduced to taking photographs, with any vigilantly effort to stop the outrage being seen as a violation. As English businesses and livelihoods were destroyed by children as young as 7 and 10 years old and with the whole of the country going into economic meltdown, England’s British MPs like Nero fiddled and enjoyed their excesses on one of their many holidays well away from the trouble.
<br />But in one (not insignificant) respect the BBC has at last been compelled to tell the truth. The riots (not protests) are English, not British or UK riots: London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham, Bristol and Gloucester are indeed English not Scottish, Welsh or Irish cities. We must at least thank the rioters together with the incompetent British politicians and police for putting England back on the map, and since the BBC has suddenly got a taste for the truth, perhaps we can start adding the following terms to the BBC lexicon (and, who knows, that Old Etonian David Cameron may follow suit). Thus:
<br />1. England’s forests the British want to sell
<br />2. England’s people who pay full university fees.
<br />3. England’s people who pay prescription charges.
<br />4 England’s NHS that denies patients Drugs given free to the Scots, Welsh and Irish
<br />5. England’s countryside the British want to concrete over
<br />6 England’s people that are forced to pay Hospital Car parking charges and Bridge tolls
<br />7. It’s the English AS WELL as the Irish, Scottish and Welsh dead in Afghanistan.
<br />8. It’s the English AS WELL as the Irish, Scottish and Welsh youths without arms and legs, having had them blown off in Afghanistan.
<br />Let us add:
<br />1. British bombs on Libyan civilians.
<br />2. British bankers.
<br />3. British MPs fiddling on expenses.
<br />4. British PMs inviting Rupert Murdoch to Downing Street through the back door.
<br />5. British parliament.
<br />6. Scottish parliament.
<br />7. Welsh assembly.
<br />8. Northern Ireland assembly.
<br />
<br />No wonder we have had riots in England when the whole British establishment is not only being perceived has being corrupt but also being proved to be so, and the reason is that they no longer have respect for the sovereignty of our nation. Thus the pusillanimous Philip Hammond, Minister of Transport, awards a contract for railway carriages to Germany and in the process adds to the deprivation and misery of Derby (England) in the midst of a recession. Then they sell our hard-won freedom to Brussels. Then they sell our football clubs (the symbol of a once precious English working-class culture) to foreign owners, foreign managers, foreign players and foreign agents. Then they set out to sell the Port of Dover our English forests and wish to destroy the English countryside by giving count blanch planning permission for concreting over England’s green belt and the building of an unnecessary High Speed line from London to Birmingham (perhaps to enable the rioters in these cities to co-ordinate their efforts more speedily). Then they abandon the national defences (Ark Royal, harrier jump jets, etc.) whilst lavishing billions on the Olympic Games and foreign aid. Then they choose New Zealanders and South Africans instead of Englishmen in our rugby and cricket teams. Then they appoint Swedish and Italian managers to run our football team. Then they insist on the singing of British anthems instead of English anthems for English teams (even when playing the Scots and the Welsh). Then England is forced to play in grey against West Germany and Australia and black against Wales instead of the white or red of England. Then they disbar the English poor from Oxford and Cambridge by the imposition of huge fees. Then they impose prescription charges on the English poor. Then they refuse a parliament to the English and stuff Westminster with Brits. In other words, they have sold our once great country (England) to foreigners and foreign interest groups. Can they really be surprised when England’s capital city is in flames?
<br />What a reward indeed for the heroes of 1939-1945.
<br />It is time for the long-suffering English to call a halt to this madness. We (the English) must seek clever, non-violent ways of rising up against the British oppressor in an ENGLISH SPRING.
<br />The first thing to do is to repudiate the British anthem for England and for goodness sake, why cannot these rugby and football supporters sing some English songs to match the Welsh and Scottish songs of their supporters, and why cannot England teams play in the colours of England and that is, for the benefit of the ignoramuses red and white, and lets all stand up and fight for a St. George’s Day public holiday.
<br />There must surely be a positive impact engendered by the pride that is encouraged in Welsh and Scottish society by their respective assembly and parliament, the teaching of their history and not being looked down on because they are from these nations. In contrast one is not allowed to be proud of England and being English as this is deemed to imply some form of racism, as does displaying England’s flag. England’s history has been replaced with a false British interpretation so there is no respect for the society in which we live and no value placed on our heritage. Our children feel they do not belong anymore and have no place in this multicultural society watching as they do the British dismantle and sell off their sovereignty and deny them their identity, is it any wonder they look for peers amongst the gangs on our streets.
<br />It did not need the speaker in the House of Commons to decide if these riots applied to England only as it was plainly obvious to everybody, everybody that is except the British Prime Minister David Cameron who recalled the entire British Parliament. This was England’s business only so why should he have had to recall the MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, was it to give them a reason to scoff over our troubles as our police force had to be backed up by their own mercenaries, or was it to encourage the suggestion England gets one from the U.S.A.
<br />
<br />English Patriot
<br />
<br />Please make sure you sign up to the petition
<br />
<br /> http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/78stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-12447704128776854802011-06-26T13:51:00.002+01:002011-06-29T11:10:36.745+01:00DECMS – Deny English Community Mainstream SupportThe Department of Culture, Media and Sport like every department and institution the British have set up to look after English interests has one thing in common with all others, a clear mandate and objective to deny the English community mainstream support, and also like all others are allowed to treat England with contempt, denying even that the departments are English only departments, preferring to hide this fact under UK or British letterheads, so I have added the ‘E’ for them. It seems that the Coalition Government in charge of this department is no wiser than New Labour on this subject so I will remind them again that these issues are devolved to the nations, so they have no jurisdiction to legally demand other nation compliance.<br /><br />It is possible to write a book on the way each aspect of this department denies England and its English Community support, but I prefer for the moment to comment on the one that is making headlines. <br />Sport<br /><br />The British realise that the national identity of its UK nations is firmly wrapped up in this department and none at least, from the publics perception greater than that revolving around a nations sporting activity, and in particular football. This national patriotism was encouraged and actually seen to be beneficial in sustaining the United Kingdom’s sovereignty before the British headed for Europe, then after instigating its devolution policies the British have realised that home nation loyalty comes at a price and are now attempting to overcome a threat of their own creation, a mounting rise in nationalism. <br /><br />It was not long after the London bid for the Olympic Games and its success that it was announced by the then Olympic Committee that Teams GB would be entered into the Olympic Football Tournament. From the offset this created a controversy across the United Kingdom’s national football associations who declared in block that they would not support such a team, because quite rightly they feared that playing in an international competition under a GB banner would jeopardise their own national team identities, and their places in future international competitions. At this time I warned that the FA, the association that is supposed to be representing England’s interest, but isn’t even allowed to state that fact (note again the missing ‘E’) else it would put it into conflict with British interests, would agree to put out an all England team if that scenario endured, thus committing England and only England to carry their GB banner in all future competitions. Now that the Olympic Games are almost upon us the FA, the British not English organisation have agreed with what I said then and they are claiming quite rightly that they have that legal responsibility to obey their masters, so the FA - f------ A------ will bow to demands being asked of them to support the British Olympic Organisation and will be preparing if necessary to do just that.<br /><br />The FA will put out an initial list of players that includes some from other UK national organisations and pretend to care when none of them accept the offer, and it’s odds on none will. What players are prepared to become traitors to their own nation and accept the offer, I will tell you who, it wont be any from the minor nations, it will the British who hide under the English shirt who will be the traitors, led by that well thought of supposed English Icon David Beckham that’s who.<br />The question is, if it happens and it will –<br /> <br /> WHAT ARE YOU THE ENGLISH GOING TO DO ABOUT IT <br />A suggestion would be perhaps to go back to the original structure of playing GB Amateur Teams in Olympic competitions.<br /><br />For the record and for those who have not read the previous pages of the West Midland Blog, at the last Olympic Games England won more Gold medals than it had done at any since the games began, and yet not one medal was accredited to England and the English, only to British, Scottish, Welsh and Irish competitors, who were also allowed to hold their own separate national celebrations when they arrived home.<br /><br />ENGLAND MUST SPEAK UP NOW AND FIGHT BRITISH DISCRIMINATION <br /><br />England is now all but a map reference having - <br /><br /> NO Parliament - NO Nation - NO Voice - NO Anthemstanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-29212576680674077412011-06-20T13:39:00.000+01:002011-06-20T13:41:20.735+01:00Devolution 1998 – England’s war of 1066 proportionsDevolution forced on the UK by Europe’s regional policies saw the British because of Scottish influence adopt a system of devolution that regionalised the United Kingdom along national boundaries. It was obvious that giving political and constitutional recognition to national regions would weaken British sovereignty, so for protection the British in their Devolution Acts of 1998 denied England, the largest of the British regions, from gaining its unitary regional existence; in doing so the British denied not only England but also its English nation from gaining their lawful right of recognition.<br /> <br />By adopting this asymmetrical form of devolution the British have retained the power to manipulate English Domestic policies to their own advantage and are using this power to reinforce their identity on the people of England. We are witnessing a forceful and psychological encouragement of Britishness that is distorting English history and culture to suit a British multiculturism that sees England has a Britain made up of their 9 British regions.<br /><br /><br />This is England Today<br /><br /><br />Since 1998 the English have been the only nation in the United Kingdom without a National Parliament and the only nation not able to defend and protect itself against ‘British’ Domestic and EU Polices, giving British Nationalists a free hand to destroy England’s unity and culture by allowing them to break up England into their 9 multicultural ‘British’ Regions, and apply EU laws with impunity.<br /><br />Since 1998 England has been marginalised by devolution, constitutionally, politically, financially, economically and culturally.<br /><br />By virtue of their national institutions Scotland and Wales have a distinct and separate political, constitutional existence and nationhood, England however does not constitutionally exist and is being denied its nationhood.<br /><br />The Devolution Acts of 1998 revoked the Act of Union, revoked the concept of one British Nation with one legislative body of government, and revoked the principle of representative democracy. It unbalanced the Union by placing England, Scotland and Wales each in a different relationship with the Union and each other, and it institutionalised discrimination against the people of England.<br /><br />The Devolution Acts of 1998 abolished representative democracy as the untouchable 1st principle of government. By what is understood to be the West Lothian issue, British MPs elected in Scotland can be both ministers and legislators, even Prime Minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer and Home Secretary in English matters without being answerable in elections for their actions in those matters to ‘any electorate’ either in Scotland or England.<br /><br />England is being broken up into British Regions and is losing its unitary existence to the disadvantage of the English Nation to whom it denies nationhood and political representation. British nationalists claim that England does not need any separate representation because they say the interests of England are best served by its British MPs; this is an untruth as they could have said the same about the interests of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, and there would have been no need for the Devolution Acts of 1998 and the UK could have remained with one united parliament.<br /><br />It is impossible to see how England can be best served by its British MPs when you consider how the British political system works. The United Kingdom Parliament’s House of Commons is not divided up into four national sectors with British MPs sitting in the sector of the country that elected them, the house divides on party political lines, the government on one side and the opposition on the other. What this means is that England’s elected representative British MPs are always divided and are always under the control of their separate political party whips, and who has ever seen or will see, or can imagine Labour and Conservative MPs sitting in English constituency seats defying their party whips to the extent of combining to defeat and bring down their own respective governments.<br /><br />With England’s political and constitutional recognition England could decide its own form of local government and would be able to take over the work performed by the regions in the EU, providing England with a stronger unified voice and force than the individual regions in applying for EU structural funds. Currently the regions apply separately for funds and are therefore in direct competition with one another. With London and the South East undoubtedly able to shout the loudest the poorer regions such as those in the North are always in danger of losing out; an English Parliament would therefore not only be a stronger lobbying force in the UK and in the EU but it would be better placed to distribute the funds more evenly across England.<br /><br />There is nothing to stop an English Parliament from deciding on a regional form of local government, the difference between an English Parliament deciding on the option and a UK British Parliament deciding, is that the first option rightly gives England and its nation their political and constitutional recognition and the second deny it, disproving again British Nationalist claims that their MPs elected from English constituencies act in England’s best interests.<br /><br />England is further disenfranchised in representation in the House of Lords, in which members from other countries in the UK and abroad, unaccountable to the English electorate, are able to revise and modify laws that only apply to England, when they can not do so for Scotland and Northern Ireland.<br /><br />‘The British / Irish Council’ known as the ‘Council of the Isles’ which <br />promotes the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of the totality of relationships among the peoples of these islands, ( British gibberish) which has representatives from Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey and even the Isle of Man, is not allowed an independent representative from England. <br /><br /><br /><br />Since Labours Devolution Acts of 1998 and their subsequent immigration policies, which included signing up to an EU open border policy, our country has been inundated with people from Europe’s 450 million inhabitants and England our homeland is no longer our own, and with each nation in the EU retaining power over its own citizenship a rogue nation could invite the world's population to our doorstep. By denying England its political and constitutional identity the nation is also being denied its ability to protect its own assets and culture, and the British are exploiting this situation by selling assets that would sustain England’s identity and are fostering a British Multiculturism on England that is encouraging the rise of alien cultures at its nation’s expense. <br /><br />Compare this with the nations of Scotland and Wales who have recognition and have a parliament with responsibility for their own nation’s education and training programs. While British Multiculturism on England is based around a false premise of Britishness, and encourages cohesion from the outside by downplaying England’s identity, the Scots and Welsh are able to do the opposite and are encouraging cohesion from the inside. Through the school curriculum all children in Scotland and Wales are now being reared and educated to have strong Scottish and Welsh national identities and knowledge of their own individual Scottish and Welsh history and heritage. The British have also given each country a separate TV channel to help them regenerate their old languages, and the Welsh language is now being taught in the schools of Wales. The British have also allowed these nations similar ‘Sports and Art’ programs backed up by other separate television channels, a BBC Scotland, BBC Wales and a BBC Northern Ireland, and they have the added bonus of separate tourist boards who promote their own distinct Scottish and Welsh cultures.<br /><br />While British Multiculturism is always demoting, a Scottish and Welsh Multiculturism is always promoting, and an obvious difference between the two was seen in the celebrations after the recent Olympic Games. England having won more Gold Medals in this Olympic Games than it had in its entire history in the competition, not only saw its winners denied their English identity in the media, but also saw their entire nation denied separate celebrations by the British on their return. Scottish and Welsh competitors on the other hand were applauded by the media and their nation status made headline news each time a medal came their way. Consider the difference too when the Scottish and Welsh competitors returned home, each nation held their own separate celebrations in Edinburgh and Cardiff with the added bonus of also being allowed to participate in the separate British celebrations in London.<br /><br />Scotland, Wales, and Ireland are also allowed to promote their own separate identities and culture through labeling, especially food items, a lot of which now sport their national flags, while English products are encouraged to display the British flag. In one instance in England, the ‘Dairy Crest’ company re-branded their ‘English Country Life Butter’ ‘British Country Life Butter’ with British government approval when the French recently acquired the brand outright. <br />The people of Scotland and Ireland have also been given a public holiday to celebrate their national saint’s St. Andrew and St Patrick while England is denied one for St. George. <br /><br /> <br /><br /> <br /><br />Only in England is a false history of a multicultural Britishness being used to deny the people and their children their heritage. Only in England is its nation having obstacles put in its way to prevent its recognition and existence, and only on England are the British pursuing a vigorous policy of Multiculturism that is amounting to the cultural genocide of its standing nation with the introduction of their new licensing laws, health and safety regulations, public order offences, liability insurance requirements, and their political correctness<br />and human rights policies.<br /><br />Constitutional and political recognition for England would see British Multiculturism replaced with an English Multiculturism like that of Scotland and Wales that could encourage and promote England’s national identity to engage all from the inside, allowing all the people of England with a British qualification to identify with the country in which they live, the very essence of which would unite England’s people under one banner like is happening in Scotland and Wales, and an English Parliament would be the centre of gravity around which all could work together to carve out a new English identity. Britishness would then be promoted throughout the UK in its true category as the requirements and responsibilities of state citizenship. <br /><br />Devolution 1998 the cause of the UK’s instability was the result of pressure being put on British Nationalists in the UK Parliament by a disillusioned Scotland and a UK Parliament that wanted to comply with the European Union’s Regional Policies that demanded it. If the devolutionary powers given to Scotland had been given to England, the simplest way to avoid a constitutional controversy, England would have received the same powers over its own domestic policies as those listed below and the UK would have held onto reserved issues. <br /><br />Under the Scotland Act 1998, the Scottish Parliament can make primary and secondary legislation in Areas not reserved to Westminster or protected from modification.<br /><br /><br />* Health * Local Government * Social Work<br />* Education and Training * Housing * Planning<br />* Tourism * Economic development and financial assistance to industry<br />* Some aspects of transport, the Scottish road network, bus policy and ports and harbours<br />* Law and home affairs, inc. most aspects of criminal and civil law, the prosecution system and the courts<br />* The Police and Fire Services * Natural and Built Heritage * Sports and the Arts<br />* The Environment * Agriculture, forestry and Fishing<br />* Statistics, public registers and records<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Other Advantages gained by the Devolved Nations <br /><br />* MPs in their own parliament and separate MPs of their own at Westminster<br />* A Secretary of State in the Cabinet<br />* A Grand Committee made up of all of their MPs<br />* Their own Select Committee at Westminster to deal with their own affairs<br />* They can speak up for their own nations in Europe and help shape UK- EU policy<br />* Have the benefit of Statutory Instruments (UK laws) to be studied by their own institution<br />* The Scottish and Welsh Development agencies deal direct with their own executives so can tailor things on a national rather than a regional basis<br />* Although the devolved nations MPs at Westminster have had their workload drastically reduced they have had no pay cut (99% of constituent’s problems now being dealt with by their own parliamentary MSPs)<br /><br />Similar powers have been given to Wales.<br /><br />You don’t have to be the brain of Britain to realise that when the UK’s British Government talks about any of the above institutions, appoints Ministers over them, and passes laws on them, that what they say and do can only apply to England, yet the media are aiding and abetting the government by not making this clear to the English general public. <br /><br />UK Parliament controlled ‘Reserved Responsibilities’<br /><br />* The Constitution * Defence and national security * Fiscal, economic and monetary system<br />* Trade and Industry, including competition and customer protection<br />* Transport (not particular to Scotland) including railways, transport safety and regulation<br />* Social Security * Employment * Equal opportunities<br />* Medical ethics: abortion; human fertilisation and embryology; genetics; xenotransplantation and vivi section<br />* Broadcasting * the Civil Service * Immigration and Nationality<br />* Foreign Affairs * Energy: electricity, coal, gas, nuclear energy <br /><br />You don’t have to be the brain of Britain either to realise that the UK Parliament’s ‘Reserved Responsibilities’ and their sovereign powers are wanted and are gradually being surrendered by the British to the EU. Giving up your sovereign rights means you are handing over the supreme and indisputable power to rule on those rights to the EU, and how far the British are prepared to go down that path depends on the whims of which political party is in power in the UK Parliament, and not its UK subjects who are being denied a referendum on the issue. If the EU gains enough power the UK will be at its mercy, England therefore needs its political and constitutional recognition now before that point is reached in order to defend itself against British MPs and Lords who have proved themselves unworthy of our trust, and have shown that they are prepared to put their own interests and those of their party before England’s.<br /><br /><br /><br />Looking at the UK list of powers devolved to Scotland and Wales, by far the most important thing every person living in England should be aware of and realise, is that the list is a list of national powers, powers given to the national parliaments of Scotland and Wales who appoint their own ministers over them, they are national institutions. <br /><br />While Scotland and Wales have national institutions and can control their own policies nationally across all of their country England can not because England has no unitary existence. If we look at the health services we see that England is heading in the direction of privatisation by being subjected to a Health Service that is not a National Health Service in the sense of the word at all, but a British based regional system of Primary Care Trusts and Foundation Hospitals. Half of English hospitals are already out of Ministerial control and it is said all will be by 2012; we must not forget that this situation has been forced on England by Scotland’s elected British MPs against the wishes of those British MPs representing England after rejecting the system for their own Scottish nation. It must not be forgotten that it is these Scottish MPs that destroyed the English National Health Service and forced it into the regional based British Health Service we have now. <br /><br />England’s regional based Foundation hospitals have been given huge sums of tax payer’s money by the British and conduct their own affairs free of British interference and are allowed to adopt differing policies and priorities in order to meet British set targets. They are run like businesses and are free to use the market as they see fit which is creating huge differences of care across England known as the post code lottery, which wouldn’t happen in a national based system. We are even seeing some of these hospitals paying for and building their own hospitals in other countries, outside of the EU too, and it is also being reported that they are selling first class drugs intended for English patients abroad for profit, while English patients go short or receive the cheaper options.<br /><br />The NHS of Scotland and Wales provides equality of care for all of their people regardless of what part of their country people live in, and care is not dependent on a post code lottery; their hospitals do not have the same restraints put on them as those in England have because they are all under ministerial control and subsidised by the English tax payer. Besides receiving a huge grant from the British Government to run their own affairs the National Parliaments also get additional payments every year made to them because the funding formula called Barnet is based on England’s expenditure, in Scotland’s case alone this formula lets the British give Scotland an extra £12 billion per year more than they give England, which they use to bolster their own welfare system. <br /><br />A National Parliament’s first priority is to the nation it serves and Scottish and Welsh national achievements since devolution are things England can only dream about and some are listed below.<br /><br />*Free Prescription charges <br />*Free Eye Tests <br />*Free Dental Check Ups and reduced charges<br />*Free personal Care in Residential Homes - even if their people cross the border into England<br />*Free School Milk - Better school meals being provided because they are given double England’s subsidy<br />* The seriously ill are able to receive drugs that are denied to English patients even if their patients are in an English hospital<br />*Trainee nurses are kept on an extra year after qualification so that they have the necessary experience to get jobs in the private sector should there be no jobs in their NHS<br />*No Hospital Car Parking Charges<br />*No Wheel Clamping allowed anywhere in the country<br />*A fully funded Air Ambulance Service<br />*No Bridge tolls<br />*Higher wages to teachers and smaller class sizes in schools<br />*Their own Students in Universities have fees waived until they are earning over £25,000 per year and no top up fees are paid. (English Students now paying up to £9000/year + in top up fees and leave with debts of £30,000+)<br />*Council Tax frozen from 2008 and has only risen 40% since 1997 (England’s council tax has risen 100% over the same period and increases every year)<br />*Every young woman between the ages of 20 and 25 is invited for a cervical smear test - in England you have to be 25, by then it is too late for any girl unfortunate enough to get it at a younger age like Jade Goody did. <br /><br />Continuing on the list we can see that the British recognised nations have responsibility for their own housing, planning, and environmental policies, the British can’t force their ECO Towns on Scotland or Wales, or force the extension of airports which they are able to force onto England. Their own Agriculture and Fisheries departments are seeing national governments make sure their farmers get their subsidies on time while the British keep English farmers waiting, some in the mean time going bankrupt, and the Scottish Fisheries Dept has already made a cut in English fishing quotas along the East Coast. The list goes on, and in every dept the nations are able to protect their people from the sufferance of the British Domestic policies that can be forced onto England; from ID Cards, to Road Pricing to bin collections, to council tax, to CTV surveillance and speed cameras, the national parliaments decide for themselves what is best for their people and do not have to accept the wishes of the British Government, and invariably do not. <br /><br />The Barnet Formula mentioned previously is the mechanism that determines the allocation of resources throughout the United Kingdom and has been in place since the 1970s. It is the formula that decides the size of the Block Grants given to the devolved nations and it is based upon England’s expenditure. It was supposed to be “a convergence formula” based on population based changes, but in practice this has not proved to be the case. Government figures show that instead of converging the opposite is happening, and it is clear that the spending per head of population in England is continually lower to that of the devolved nations and the gap is actually widening.<br /><br />In 2008 spending in England per head of population was £7,121. In Wales it was £8,139 (14% more), in Scotland £8,623 (21% more) and in Northern Ireland £9,385 (32% more) new figures for 2009 England £7535, Scot £9179 Scots get £1644 more. Since the Scottish Parliament was created in 1998 public spending has outstripped tax generated there by 45%, and in addition Scotland’s two flagship banks, HBOS and RBS have been bailed out by the tax payer.<br /><br />Basically, every extra pound spent by the UK British Government on England projects automatically triggers an additional 10.66% payout to Scotland, a 6.02% payout to Wales and a 2.87% payout to Northern Ireland. So, for example, this means that any capital projects taking place in England are automatically made a total of 19.55% more expensive, because they instantly trigger extra Barnett Formula funding. This is why the proposed Cross Rail project in England means a financial bonanza in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and it has been estimated that Scotland alone will receive an extra £500 million pounds. Of course, this is a one-way process, capital projects elsewhere in the UK do not result in a single penny of extra funding for England.<br /><br />But that is not all, when “uniform” adjustments, are made across treasury departments, for example Health, the same increase when applied to an already larger per capita budget naturally results in an even larger additional payout. In theory, these adjustments can be decreases as well as increases, but of course in practice this doesn’t happen. <br />For example, one of Gordon Brown’s last actions as Chancellor of the Exchequer was to slash England’s British Health Service capital budget by a third, £2.1 billion taken away from the English whilst the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish budgets remained untouched, and of course, any steps taken to return the money to England’s British Health Service will trigger automatic payouts to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.<br /><br />The ‘£9000 top-up’ student tuition fees in England are also counted as additional English public expenditure, (because the extra income is spent by our universities). So by putting the burden of tuition fees on English students British MPs triggered a payout to the nations under the Barnett Formula, helping the nations to give their students free tuition. <br /><br />The Barnett Formula also ensures that the rest of the UK benefits when England receives European Union (EU) funds. This is because the Treasury regards EU funding as UK expenditure, based on the argument that the UK is a net contributor to the EU and therefore EU grants are just money from the UK taxpayer. A large increase in EU funding to England is reflected in the Department Expenditure Limits (DELs) of the relevant English departments. DELs not only set limits on spending but also determine the assigned budget of the devolved nations in conjunction with the Barnett Formula. Therefore, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive extra funding from the UK Treasury, even though the intention of the EU was to meet the particular needs of England.<br /><br />The Barnett Formula isn’t just fuelling resentment in England; it is also funding separation in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Because unequal, asymmetric devolution that deliberately ignores England’s constitutional and political existence is all about separation. <br /><br />The Barnett Formula itself is expressively based upon nationality, not need. It is specifically and openly all about handing over money to the nations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – money taken in taxes from England.<br />The argument that these taxes are UK taxes doesn’t hold water. More money is spent in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland than is raised in taxes. The shortfall is made up in England and so it is English taxpayers who pay for the superior services elsewhere.<br /><br />It is true that rural areas are more expensive to provide services to. But most of Scotland’s population lives in the Central Belt, which can hardly be described as “rural.” Glasgow alone has 40% of the Scottish population, and whereas there is an argument to be made for Wales being a poorer area of the UK and thus needing more funding, this cannot apply to Scotland which is recognised as being the third richest of the 12 EU regions.<br /><br />Why should taxes on the low-paid in places in the North East of England go to support Edinburgh millionaires? The people of the North East are on average 13% poorer than the people of Scotland, but despite this they receive less government spending. Remember, Joel Barnett who devised the funding formula has said recently it was never intended to be the long term answer, and contradicted Gordon Brown by stressing that it was a population based formula not one based on need, that had run its course and was now grossly unfair to England.<br /><br />This Barnet Formula will not be changed while England has no constitutional and political existence and England will continue to take the brunt of taxes to pay for British incompetence because of the aggressive nature of British Nationalism.<br /><br />We have recently had a General Election and nothing changes as we hear the Con/Dem British Nationalist parties of Tory and Liberal continuing to trumpet their support for Scotland and have promised even in the midst of the UK’s Billions of debt that there will be no reduction in their nations funding in the short term; it’s England then that is going to take the brunt of cuts in public expenditure and be subjected to British revenue raising budgets.<br /><br />England’s troubles began in 1997 when a gang of Scottish conspirators and Europhiles were supported by a United Kingdom Prime Minister backed by English elected British MPs who were prepared to sacrifice England and the English Nation that elected them for the glorification of Scotland and their New Labour Party. Tony Blair was the Prime Minister and Gordon Brown headed the long list of conspirators that included Charles Kennedy the then leader of the Liberal Party, Menzies Campbell his successor, and such people as the disgraced speaker Michael Martin and George Galloway amongst them, who had signed an oath in 1989 known as ‘The Scottish Claim of Right’ swearing to put the interests of Scotland before that of any other nation, and in doing so forced UK’s 1998 Devolution. <br /><br />From this day British MPs elected from English constituencies can not be trusted to put England’s interests before that of their party.<br /><br /><br />The West Lothian Question<br /><br />Why should MPs elected by the countries of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland into the British UK Parliament be allowed to debate and vote on policies that only apply to England, when British MPs elected by England to the UK Parliament can not debate and vote on policies that only apply to their countries.<br /><br />The result of their interference in English legislation has already resulted in England being forced down the road of NHS privatisation with Foundation Hospitals, and also forced our University students to pay Top Up fees, and most recently influenced the stopping of trials by Jury for certain offences.<br /><br />The English Question<br /><br />Who rules England – Why should British MPs elected in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland be allowed to be head of English only departments deciding English Domestic Policies when they can not force those same policies onto their own nations that elected them, and one as even made himself Prime Minister. <br />-----------------------------------------------<br /><br />England and Englishness are something to be positively proud about. It is the right of the people of England to have their own distinct particular English national identity acknowledged within the UK and the EU as those of Scotland and Wales have been acknowledged in the 1998 Devolution legislation.<br /><br />The British do not wish to recognise England and Englishness because it gives them a problem with their identity and reduces their power, so they are trying to solve it by supplanting the name Britain for England and forcing an invented indigenous British multi-cultural identity onto the English Nation.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-22934577843918067312011-05-26T22:40:00.001+01:002011-05-27T22:19:47.169+01:00St. George’s Day and St. David’s Day BillSponsor Mr. Nadhim Zahawi (Stratford on Avon)<br /><br />Summary<br /><br />The Bill would amend the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 to provide that 23 April (St. George’s Day) or nearest working day should be a bank holiday in England but not in Wales, and that 1 March (St. David’s Day) or nearest working day should be a bank holiday in Wales but not in England. <br />The Bill would enable the Secretary of State to designate an alternative date for the St. George’s Day bank holiday if it fell on Good Friday or Easter Monday.<br />The Bill would address the grave injustice of inequality that exists across the United Kingdom that allows only the Scots and Northern Irish to celebrate their saint days.<br /><br />Mr. Nadhim Zahawi MP for Stratford on Avon withdrew his bill after a short debate because Minister Mr. John Hayes announced that the DCMS strategy allowed for a consultation on moving the May Day Bank Holiday, and one suggestion is that it might be moved to St. George’s or St. David’s day. <br /><br />In my opinion Mr. Zahawi should not have withdrawn his Bill and England should have no confidence that the outcome of such a consultation will result in a St. George’s Day bank holiday, because rather than try to confirm it the withdrawal of this Bill if anything as done the opposite, and could more or less have guaranteed its failure if the mood of the short debate this Bill had continues into that consultation. While the Bill stood England could guarantee the full support of Wales, and Mr. Jonathan Edwards (Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) confirmed this when he stated that it was a grave injustice that the Scots can celebrate St. Andrew, the Irish in Northern Ireland can celebrate St. Patrick, but the English cannot celebrate St. George, and in Wales they cannot celebrate St. David, and added that he wanted it put on record that the entire Welsh nation strongly supported the Bill.<br /> <br />Mr. Zahawi who was himself co-founder of the YouGov market research firm also stated that his Bill received 68% support in one of their polls and 89% in a Facebook UK Democracy page he had teamed up with that had had a response rate 800% higher than usual. <br /><br />With all this public support in both England and Wales to right the wrong of what is another UK divisive and destructive policy you would have expected MPs that claim to support the Union would have given this Bill a favourable response, but when you think that the Bill if passed into law will give England at least some sort of formal recognition the Little Britishers are not so keen. Step up one of our own Labour Black Country MPs Mr. Ian Austin of Dudley, who hypocritically declared his support and then set about trashing the idea or got totally confused that the debate was about England and Wales and inequality and not Britain, has he continually ranted on about Britishness and what it meant to him to be British. The saying goes that the Cuckoos sing in May and obviously this man is one and has got into our Black Country nest, and is one who we can not rely on for support in any consultation process; he wants a British Trafalgar or Falklands Day holiday instead. If this is Ed Milliband's policy for connecting with England then the imerging Blue Labour movement has a mountain to climb to convince the electrate his Labour Party is any different from that of Gordon Brown when it comes to dealing with England, and from this debate we can have no confidence in David Cameron’s Tories either, as another West Midland MP a Conservative Mr. Christopher Pincher (Tamworth) who also wanted a Trafalgar Day gave an example of why the people of England should not be represented by these British MPs when he set about trashing all the virtues of England’s St. George when asking why do we not celebrate Trafalgar day rather than the day of a mythical Greek who went around slaying mythical beasts? <br />When the May Day bank holiday was mentioned in this short debate Mr. Mark Lazarowicz (Edinburgh North and Lieth) said he hoped that it was not being suggested that the May Day holiday should not continue, because he said if that approach were to be associated with introducing St George’s day or St David’s day, it would destroy the otherwise bipartisan approach to the debate, and added that he thought that Mr. Zahawi would not want that either, which beggars the question why Mr. Zahawi withdrew his Bill.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-83806025816094598142011-05-10T14:30:00.008+01:002011-05-19T14:30:29.616+01:00One year into a new government and its no change for the EnglishFor thirteen years British MPs representing England in the United Kingdom Parliament have sat on their backsides and watched what were virtually Scottish led New Labour governments destroy all that was good about Great Britain. These so called English MPs were so engrossed in lining their pockets with fools Gold after being allowed to fiddle their expense sheets, dig out their Moats and the refurbish their Duck Houses that they had no time to consider the consequences of what was happening to the country they represented, and as long as a blind eye was being cast over their dealings they couldn’t have cared less, and only when it was too late did they realise that the Scottish tail was now wagging the English dog. The United Kingdom is now a shadow of its former self, and those British MPs who represented England over that period have disgraced themselves and have a lot to answer for; they sat back and watched and said nothing when successive British governments denied England its ability to have a voice in parliament and never protested when our nation, historically one of the first unified nations on Earth was treated with contempt and even denied its existence, and it was good riddance when a third of them were sent packing in 2010, a pity it was not all of them.<br /><br />When the country went to the polls to elect a new government in 2010 it was reasonable of us to expect that the influx of new blood would reflect on passed mistakes and would make every effort to right the wrongs and forge in roads into re-uniting a Kingdom that had started to tear itself apart. Although no one party had won an outright victory in the election and we ended up with coalition government it was still our assumption that preserving the Union would be the first priority of such a government, but it seems we were mistaken, and far from trying to unite the nations the policies coming from the coalition is doing the opposite and appears to be designed to tear them further apart. Faced with an economic deficit and debts of crisis proportions caused by the collapse of the banks and failures of the last government, the first priority of any new government would obviously be to balance the books, and what better opportunity could there be for a government wanting to create unity than making everyone of her majesty’s subjects pay their equal share of the debt. This is not happening, and what we are seeing is a continuation of the last governments policies in making an unrecognised England pay far more than its fair share of the debt, and like the last government they ignore England’s cries for a fair and honest hearing in the devolution process while at the same time handing out gifts to Scotland and Wales that encourages their independence. Lies, Lies, more Lies and hypocrisy can only be used to describe a government that spouts rhetoric of unity yet commits actions of separation, none more powerful than the act of allowing Wales to gain further power to make laws of discrimination against the Queen’s subjects in other parts of the United Kingdom, the brunt of which will fall directly on our unrecognised English Nation already reeling from the hypocrisy of a coalition who agree with the discrimination against England’s students, and the discrimination of our sick by the other nations. Anyone of average intelligence and you would expect that would apply to a British MP would know that given a choice a nation will always take the one in which it can decide its own destiny, so why did they act surprised when Scotland voted for the SNP and Wales voted for law making powers for their assembly, Lies, Lies, and more Lies THEY CAN’T BE THAT STUPID.<br /><br />If the British want the Union to survive they must now start looking for some type of federal or confederal solution before it’s to late, because Wales will eventually follow Scotland down the national path, and we in England are not alone going to be palmed off into taking on their failing British Identity. If this British Government is serious about saving the Union it should drop its intensions of forming separate committees to look for answers that prevent England gaining its identity, and HOL reform, and instead should immediately set up a Select Committee with a view to finding a federal solution to the UK problems.<br />If that is not forth coming it’s time then for all Unionists to realise that the Union is over, because have no doubt for reasons already given Scotland will vote for independence given the chance, and the fight will then be for an English England or British Britain<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lt0cAKQk04&feature=watch_responsestanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-58273757377320476972011-04-26T12:24:00.009+01:002011-04-26T21:23:19.420+01:00Stonecross St. George’s Day West Bromwich 24th April<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjggB6uM1ip17fBvKsygHP4PzIImNV49kjmq2VjNl9ixYA1RqsW4ktM3Q_p-0v6dk3tcil70syvXaE-KN7yiR7NOM9ON2Mr0z-noNS34p1EsGXKTXiAwcIZgFlCywcE3lw6okGCckMJdAg/s1600/West+Bromwich+Parade+2011+003.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjggB6uM1ip17fBvKsygHP4PzIImNV49kjmq2VjNl9ixYA1RqsW4ktM3Q_p-0v6dk3tcil70syvXaE-KN7yiR7NOM9ON2Mr0z-noNS34p1EsGXKTXiAwcIZgFlCywcE3lw6okGCckMJdAg/s320/West+Bromwich+Parade+2011+003.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599858267673732994" /></a><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhheE_8oiiCO1XQbBSTA-XUif4jqPdCTDShbwVQg0MdXFTKOkxVdBH9rpyw5jQFHKkmyI315MKby2u9q5rZuGNn4oUiU-CxV6fYKNgTqmq7MrMhJoESlrUC2TFd06wexuxow26-97dc9C4/s1600/West+Bromwich+Parade+2011+011.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhheE_8oiiCO1XQbBSTA-XUif4jqPdCTDShbwVQg0MdXFTKOkxVdBH9rpyw5jQFHKkmyI315MKby2u9q5rZuGNn4oUiU-CxV6fYKNgTqmq7MrMhJoESlrUC2TFd06wexuxow26-97dc9C4/s320/West+Bromwich+Parade+2011+011.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5599857361018626002" /></a><br />More than the expected 20,000 people from across the Black Country flocked to West Bromwich to take part in the celebrations to honour England’s patron saint, and for almost two hours the streets around the town became one mass of Red and White as English patriots marched in a parade that stretched almost a third of the route from Westminster Road to Dartmouth Park. Getting people into the mood at the start of the parade was organiser Mark and blind Dave Heeley helped by Baggie Bird and a look alike former Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who stood in for the Queen this year because she was busy organising her grandson’s wedding. Leading the parade was the ever loyal Northfield Caledonia band supported in the march by the bands of the England’s Supporters and Walsall Coronets who must be congratulated for their stirling endurance and performances. The number of attractions in Dartmouth Park must have surprised everyone who knew of the problems being met by the organisers even as late as two weeks before the event, and I hope that people show their appreciation by offering their assistance or donating to next years event. The parade ended at the War Memorial in the park in a salute to past patriots before people dispersed to the attractions which included this year, Bouncy Castles, Morris Dancers, a Viking settlement, Scooter display, Pat Collins Fun Fair, besides a variety of Craft stalls and food vans not forgetting our own campaign stand.<br />Our stand had to be brought all the way up from Salisbury after it had taken pride of place in the local market there on Saturday and thanks have to go to Veronica and John Newman who had very little sleep in order to bring it. The stand was manned by Veronica, John, and the West Midland team of John Stanhope, Julian Asher and Nigel Bromage with appearances from our Chairman Eddie Bone and members Fred Bishop and Tony Trahearn. I am glad to say that at most times throughout the day people were two and three deep and scrambling to put their names down on our supporters lists, so many were they that at one point we had to put out 6 separate sheets to accommodate the queue. All in all in was grand day for a grand occasion and everyone left happy.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-68322113172941361382011-04-07T14:10:00.003+01:002011-04-07T16:10:20.458+01:00Stonecross St.George's Day Parade West BromwichThe Campaign for an English Parliament is attending the parade again this year and you are invited to come along and meet your local Representatives at the CEP Stand in the park. The one and half mile walk from Stonecross to the park is a lot of fun for everybody so we look forward to seeing you dressed up in your Red and White and waving your flags in celebrating your Englishness, and if the Sun shines so much the better.<br />Since the council withdrew their funding of the parade some three years ago the organisers are constantly having to overcome obstacles not before experienced,the least not being the necessary requirement of raising thousands of pounds every year to pay for road closers and policing.It is thanks to their efforts throughout the year and their ability to act quickly to changing circumstances that this event which attracts 15,000 to 20,000 people is again able to take place.<br />If you or any of your family or friends come and join the parade I am asking you to consider making a £1 donation towards the cost, and this can done on their web site <br />www.stonecrossstgeorge.org or in a £1 coin on the day.<br />The parade this year takes place on Easter Sunday 24th March and if you can help on the day please ring me 01902630110 ASAP.<br /><br />The British don't want to give England a public holiday on St. George's Day because it could create a feeling in England of nationhood,which goes against British policy of devolution which is designed to prevent England gaining that political and constitutional recognition, so your celebration of St. George is also your protest against that British injustice.<br /><br />We must not forget that it is the British that are denying England its political recognition, the British MPs we have sent to parliament to represent England, it is these who are to blame. Until we have our own English MPs not British MPs representing England nothing is going to change.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-50665984380958320862011-04-05T11:03:00.006+01:002011-04-05T11:11:13.913+01:00Have the British made one mistake to many by using April 1st to make fools of the EnglishYou can’t fool all of the people all of the time the saying goes, so have the people of England at last realised on April 1st of all days that the British joker is no fool to be laughed at, and are they at last realising that the joke is on them, not only on April 1st 2011 but on every day since devolution 1998 denied them and their country their political and constitutional existence. Since April 1st England’s Health Service has become the only one in the United Kingdom that will not be giving out free prescriptions, and to compound the joke it is England that is providing the money for the other nations to get theirs free. How can the United Kingdom exist when certain parts have better benefits than the English and the English rights to those benefits are being vetoed by Scottish, Welsh and Irish MPs. The British don’t seem to realise that the future of the United Kingdom is at stake, and nor do they realise that an essential feature of the Union must be equality, or is it ingrained in the British psyche that they think that an English life in all its aspects isn’t worth the same as a Scottish, Welsh or Irish one. The United Kingdom no longer has one NHS, since devolution 1998 the UK now has four health services three of which, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are truly national and are under the control of government ministers and fully funded, while England, the only country without its own parliament is being forced to accept a privatised British Regional Health Service in which patient care depends more on where you live than the severity of the complaint, and has resulted in what is termed a post code lottery. The irony of the situation is that the British MPs who forced this privitisation on England were elected from the nations whose counties had been given their own parliament and they new full well that it would not apply to their own health services. Next time you are ill and take your prescription to the pharmacy to pay £7-40 per item put on the fools cap and stand in the corner, because not only are you paying for something the other nations get free but you will probably be paying for second class generic equivalents too.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-16316964928148493972011-02-09T11:12:00.005+00:002011-02-09T15:24:37.040+00:00It is England’s Forests not British Forests they want to sellIt is surely time that the media respected the distinction between British and English forests (and more generally between Britain and England). Otherwise we shall be led to think that it is engaging in British propaganda. It should be the media’s job to tell the general public when the United Kingdom government is intending to pass a bill that does not effect Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland not to assist it by referring to England only bills has being British bills, or bills for Britain. It should be made clear to the public that the forests the Coalition intend to sell off are England’s forests, and only England’s forests, they are not Britain’s forests or British forests which implies the forest sales would apply across the UnitedKingdom The conduct of the Coalition in respect to the sale of English assets in this case forests is little better than that of the previous Labour government, and together the British political parties simply ignore the manifest will of the people of England, even ignoring their own manifesto pledges. It was certainly not a part of any manifesto presented to the electors of Cannock Chase and South Staffordshire in 2010 that the Cannock Chase forest was going to be put up for sale. In my view the dishonourable behaviour of MPs Aiden Burley and Gavin Williamson in voting for the sale of their own areas greatest asset, and all of the other British Conservative MPs who voted for the Coalitions proposal, proves once and for all that British MPs have no loyalty to England or the English nation; preferring to put their own and their own parties interests before any other, and that applies to all three main political parties. True patriotic MPs should show their loyalty to England by breaking away and forming their own English political party.<br /><br />Vote to save Cannock Chase http://www.savecannockchase.org.uk/stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4360322304882182357.post-56447012631125684742010-12-29T13:36:00.006+00:002011-01-31T16:21:40.386+00:00England pays the price of being denied its English IdentityIt has been some time since I last blogged because I thought the April 2010 one said it all, however I am now so angry with the British over their treatment of England’s University students I am going to start again and this is more than a rant. <br /> <br /> England and its citizens are suffering more prejudice and discrimination than citizens in any other part of the United Kingdom because England has no voice. British political parties show more support and less discrimination against those citizens in places like Jersey, Guernsey, and the little isle of Man than they do of those in England, their citizens at least have been given a voice and separate representation in the British / Irish ‘Council of the Isles’ to which England and its citizens are denied. This action by the British and Irish governments amounts to outright racism against the people of England and the English nation, and it is being supported by all of those countries of the UK that attend it. The objective of this British / Irish ‘Council of the Isles’ is to promote the harmonious and mutually beneficial development of the relationships between all of the people of these islands, all it appears except those in England.<br /><br />The people of England are not only suffering discrimination from the British United Kingdom government, but also from our fellow British citizens in other parts of the United Kingdom. Devolution is allowing the people of England to be discriminated against in varying degrees by citizens of all UK national regions without any recourse, one nation, Scotland, has even been given a parliament that can legally legislate against us. A change in government has not seen a change in attitude, and the present economic climate is a bonus it appears to those Ministers and MPs in the coalition who want to continue England’s destruction and discrimination, as we see the sell off of another icon of our identity, and with it the possibility of the Queen’s Head on our stamps, not to mention England’s forests. The British Coalition government says it believes in the Union yet it is deliberately creating policies that are increasing friction, like making unequal cuts and funding across the regions, and offering more devolution to Scotland and Wales, while ignoring England. It is shocking too that it is not only the Tory, and Liberal Parties, but Labour and the entire British establishment who are party to this increase in devolution, and even more shocking and an insult, that without consulting England the British have agreed to the Welsh referendum in March 2011 that will decide if Wales too wants the same legal right to legislate and discriminate against England and their fellow United Kingdom citizens, while at the same time refusing to answer the West Lothian Question. <br /><br />If Wales gets its Law making parliament in May, England will be at the mercy of Laws made in the parliaments of the EU, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Channel Isles, Isle of Man, and a UK parliament full of British Racists. <br /><br />There are no boundaries as far as the British are concerned when it comes to England’s discrimination, its citizens, young and old alike, rich, poor, the dying the sick, they treat all with contempt compared to how the government’s of national regions treat their citizens, besides which they are systematically dismantling England and selling off its icons of identity.<br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />Fight the Fees <br /><br />At present it is the British Education Policy for England that is taking central focus in the media, and discrimination against England could not be shown more clearly than the injustice that has been metered out to England’s University students. Increases in tuition fees that the British are forcing England’s students to pay compared with fees that the national governments of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are going to ask off theirs and EU students is not only unfair, it is grotesque, in what the British keep telling us is a United Kingdom.<br /><br />This power of discrimination against England’s students was first felt in the 1999 Scottish government elections, when the abolition of University tuition fees became a major issue in the forming of the Lab / Lib coalition that governed Scotland 1999/2003. The Liberal Party stood by its manifesto pledge and the coalition depended on the Labour Party’s acceptance of the Liberal Policy; a deal which saw the abolition of tuition fees for Scotland’s domiciled students and for students attending Scottish Universities from Europe. A deal however that denied that same privilege to students attending Scottish Universities from other parts of the UK, even those from England whose nation was being forced to subsidise the deal with their taxes. The Liberal Party cry then was and still is “Going to University must be decided on the ability to learn, not the ability to pay” which obviously is now a cry being taken up by all of our national governments, and refers to cheap or free education for their own and European students but as no reference to England’s students, who along with the English nation is helping fund it.<br /><br /><br />The EU says their students studying in the UK must be treated in the same way as domiciled students are treated in the region that they study, so are entitled to the same discounts and benefits offered by national regional governments. By far the most destructive and discriminating part of EU law on devolution however is the one that came to light in the 1999 Scottish election and the reason why we could not fight England’s discrimination then, and why we can’t now. It is the law of devolution, it gives regional governments the power to discriminate against citizens of other regions within the same State, and it is not being given the full attention it deserves by the media, the full force of which is felt by the English who have No Region, No Defence, and No Voice, and is the reason England must fight tooth and nail to stop any British Government creating and giving the same power to regions in whatever disguise they take within England’s borders, or the English Nation will tear itself apart.<br /><br /><br />I hope English students can create enough noise to make England’s sleeping nation wake up and realise its discrimination in all areas and not just education, though violence of any sort cannot be condoned. With the outstanding debt of the British state there maybe justifiable reasons to ask students to subsidise their own education, but if we still have a United Kingdom then every student/citizen of it should be made to contribute to the debt equally. Instead, the British are using England’s unrecognised Nation to subsidise the contributions being made by our fellow citizens in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, and also those coming here from the European Union, and no matter how much the British Government or the EU tries to convince us otherwise, their devolution policies are not fair, are racially motivated and are against human rights and should not happen in what they keep telling us is a United Kingdom.<br /><br />Summary<br /><br />England’s students pay £3290 now but are being made to meet the full cost of their University tuition fees from 2012 because of British cuts to England’s funding. Students will then pay between £6000 and £9000 a year for a 3year degree course at any University in England, which if you add on living costs arrives at a figure between £40,000 and £50,000 for the 3 year course at a minimum. The British Government allows England’s students a loan but are reducing its size, and it appears the low fixed rate of interest they now pay on it could be removed and opened up to market forces increasing its cost, besides which the government grant EMA is being removed. The student does not have to pay the tuition fees up front and the loan does not have to be paid back until the student is earning £21,000 at which point they start paying back 9% of their earnings; the loan taking an average student an estimated 30years to pay off. European students pay the same fees as England’s students if they study at England’s Universities, unless they or their parents have lived for the 3 years previously in either Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland, when instead they will pay the fees decided by the respective governments of the nation lived in, EU students can even get extra help if they have lived for 3years in the Channel Isles or the Isle of Man. It is also a fact that even now before the rise in tuition fees takes effect that less than a third of EU students have been paying back their fees, which beggars the question of whether the British are a willing partner in subsidising these EU students at English Universities. <br /><br /> Fees to be paid by Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish, and EU students living in those countries are still under revision, also under revision are the fees that these countries are going to charge England’s students that attend their Universities, but;<br /><br />Scotland’s domiciled Scottish students do not pay top up fees at any UK University now and are not expected to pay any after the revision and they also get a better deal on living costs. EU students with the 3year qualification qualify for the same benefits the domiciled Scots get now and it is debatable whether they can be charged any differently after the revision?<br />English/Welsh/NI students attending Scottish Universities after revision are expected to be charged the same fees that the British charge English students in England, to stop the exodus from England for cheaper fees.<br />Only England’s students are guaranteed to be forced to pay the full fees in Scotland however, because the Welsh and Northern Irish governments have given a guarantee of funding to their students to keep their fees at the £3290 a year they pay now.<br /><br />Welsh domiciled students studying at Universities in Wales and EU students with the 3year qualification pay £3290 a year now but get a grant of £1890 towards it off the government, fees are not expected to change after the revision. Tuition fees for English/Scottish and N. Irish students attending Welsh Universities are expected to rise after the revision to meet those set by the British for England, for the reasons given above. It will only be the English however who pay the full fee because the Scots pay nothing and the N. Irish government have given the guarantee that their students will not pay more than the £3290 they pay now.<br /><br />I have just been shown page six of today’s SUN newspaper, Wednesday 29th December 2010 and it should go down in history, and it just about sums up what these British Racists think of the people of England. David Willetts the Minister for England’s University Education says the Coalition Government is going to subsidise the tuition fees and living costs of England’s University students, but only for those children of service personnel killed in action, in other words the British expect the English to give their lives for what others get for doing nothing, unbelievable.<br /><br /><br />Unless England becomes a national region within the United Kingdom and Europe with its own English Parliament, Brussels will continue to recognise England to be a Britain, the part left over from British devolution in 1998, and will leave England, its people, its culture, and its assets to the mercy of a British government that is denying the English Nation its political and constitutional existence, and to any other United Kingdom nation that wants to discriminate against it.stanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17940074204249284667noreply@blogger.com0