England Better Together than Regions Apart

England watched how all the main political parties stuck together in mass to support the independence no vote in the Scottish referendum. They virtually got on their hands and knees as they begged, pleaded, and yes even cried to woo the Scottish electorate. Unbelievably, they allowed Gordon Brown the self appointed ex Prime Minister and a Scotsman; the man mainly responsible for the “Scottish claim of Right “

ttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TSxGuNrc2vg&NR=1   that led us to this situation, offer the Scots terms of agreement for a no vote that has sent shock waves through the UK constitution.

How differently these parties reacted when the Scots accepted this agreement, no mass support from them for England to receive anything like this devolution settlement. One party though the Conservative thought a consideration was necessary after they thought the offer had highlighted how England was being treated unfairly. It is surprising that any political party noticed this when you consider that England has been treated unfairly by all the main stream political parties since New Labour’s devolution program of 1998, and have all been constructive in denying the political and constitutional existence of England and an English identity, the implications of which have led to the English question.

The English don’t believe these political parties through self interest have any intension of tending to England’s grievances with anything like the vigor they fought for Scotland’s. Already the conservative party has selected Graham Allen an MP known not to support an English Parliament to chair their House of Commons Political and Constitutional Committee looking into the situation. Until British MP’s accept that there are four indigenous Nations on these islands not three, that each one needs to be treated equally and fairly there can be no sustainable union.

Any talk of regional government in any form by any political party or politicians without first giving England and the English nation national recognition should be fought against if England is to survive.

In the latest slight on our English identity England’s rugby team has to suppress a patriotic film rallying support for the side due to fears of political ramifications. Stuart Lancaster the side’s head coach said that at a private viewing some of the audience who watched the film was in tears.

Campaign Update

                                           

We approach our campaigning with grim determination and have made considerable inroads into the British Establishment and with the referendum on Scottish independence coming up in September we need to keep the pressure on. Below is a summary of the achievements and events of the last year and hope that you will consider the CEP a worthwhile campaign to which to subscribe.

Our activities over the years have produced the following results:

·         Because of the oral and written evidence we gave the McKay Commission, the Commissioners went beyond their sole remit to propose a procedural device at Westminster. They further stated that only an ‘all-England’ solution is acceptable, agreed that England needed a voice, rejected regional assemblies or localism as English devolution and stated that the political parties must produce manifestos for England. In addition to calling for an English Parliament these were precisely the additional requirements that we made in our evidence.

·         Secondly all the articles now being written by correspondents, columnists and journalists about the Constitution not only draw heavily on the articles, leaflets, booklets and pamphlets that we have circulated and published but lift whole sentences and paragraphs from what we have been publishing over the years. The fact that they do not have the courtesy to acknowledge us is not down to any lack on our part.

·         Thirdly our Campaign Director, Eddie Bone, is now frequently invited on to the British broadcast media for his opinion on the current state of the constitution. He was interviewed alongside Plaid Cymru's Leanne Woods and the Ulster Unionist Mike Nesbit by Dermot Murnaghan on Sky News in January. This is clearly a step forward from when only the pop artist Billy Bragg was invited to comment on English matters.

Some events and activities that we have been involved in during the last year and anticipated:

We continually meet and lobby MPs. Consequently our third 'Future of England' event took place in the House of Lords last November.  Frank Field MP, Lord Maclennan, Frank Field MP, Professor Richard Wyn Jones and Eddie Bone, who had appeared on two BBC Politics programmes that day, spoke. Our annual open meeting, when we met members and discussed activities, was on the same day.  In January we demonstrated and leafletted in Portsmouth about the political decision to sacrifice jobs in the historic shipyards in favour of retaining those in Scotland and flew a banner inviting the Mayor, who described herself as Welsh and therefore not responsible for English affairs, to resign.  We have give written evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee inquiry on Scottish independence: constitutional implications for the rest of the UK.

Labour and Trades Union events we have attended are antagonistic to us and refer to ‘salami slicing’ England to divide and weaken us without the public noticing.  They intend to bribe city councils by expanding city regions but to keep this policy quiet until the next election manifesto is published.  At a London event on a UK Constitutional Convention it was clear that the speakers and organisers did not intend us in England to be treated as one nation. At a Conservative Party conference there was a debate on the UK, which comprised representatives from the devolved countries but none from England!  Currently UKIP have no policy on the governance of England although Nigel Farage has publicly supported the creation of an English Parliament and we had stalls and an oversubscribed fringe event at the September UKIP conference.

The Coalition parties appointed members of the McKay Commission whose title and remit excluded ‘England’ and addressed only the House of Commons viewpoint. The 5 man Commission was set up with a majority of members from the devolved nations and none to represent England. Their report, which redefined the West Lothian Question as the English Question, is insufficient for us. However, once we have some form of EVEOL, territorial classification of bills and English manifestos, the people of England are likely to press for further changes. Once England has a voice it will be impossible and very unwise to ignore it. Articles in the press, using the arguments we put forward ten years ago, illustrate why EVOEL will not work.  The next step is to prove that the only equitable and workable answer is an English Parliament.

We have kept our voice within the English question debate by issuing press releases constantly and writing to all political journalists and Universities’ political departments asking for a debate on the position of England in a devolved UK.  The Census, The Mckay commission, Think Tank and newspaper reports of the Coalition's attempts to answer the English Question have helped our issues move up the political agenda and gain academic acceptance.

Last year NC members have given numerous radio and TV interviews in England. Our campaign has been reported in Prospect magazine but, shamefully only with the imminence of the Scottish referendum have major British media been interested in our views.  The Huffington Post, a US news website, includes our articles but makes them difficult to find.  The editors of the New Statesman and Country Life are antagonistic to our campaign. Eddie Bone attended an academic conference in Cardiff on the effects of the Scottish referendum and was pleased with the response to our campaign.  He also attended a conference in Manchester about our changing Union and also Dundee University. 

The CEP battlewagon does turn heads, it gets a friendly honk or the thumbs up! It attends many events and gatherings. Would you like to organise a meeting near you for us to attend with it and a continuous PowerPoint presentation showing the effect devolution has had on England? To speak to the team please ring 0845 6346108 or email campaigns@thecep.org.uk.

We have a professional quality camera so we can make films and broadcast interviews; to date with Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Paul Salveson and Jim Hancock (campaigning for a 'Northern' Parliament) and CEP members' testimonials. We need donations to defray the cost of camera and sound equipment.  To raise some of the funds necessary to expand our campaign we have signed up to www.easyfundraising.org.uk.  When you buy online at participating stores, at the standard price, a proportion will be credited to our bank account.  Please register and use this way to help us to continue our campaign.  If every member could recruit one new member then our income would double! You could also  join the 100 club.  It costs just £10 annually to join and cash prizes (value depends on numbers of members) are drawn 5 times a year at every NC meeting, except the AGM. 

We cannot keep up this level of activity without the commitment of members so you see a regular contribution both personally and financially would be greatly appreciated.

Dairy Crest Response

Call me Dave has hired a Looby Loo shrink to run psychometric tests on MP’s, the Campaign for an English Parliament suggests that Dairy Crest do the same and run a similar test on its PR and advertising departments. Perhaps both will then come to the same conclusion and realise that these people can only fool all of the people some of the time, and not all of the people all of the time.
We have had a reply from Dairy Crest on our complaint about the changing of identity of their Country Life butter product, from its original English Label to a British Label, and they tell us that people have requested this?
No they have not, when this company with its French interests recently acquired 100% of the Country Life Label they could not wait to shove it in our English faces and have been determined to ignore its English connection.
We have asked who these people are? and pointed out to them that we too had asked the people, in two Mori polls, one ICM poll, and a BBC poll across England, and these had shown that 68% of the population of our country wanted to be identified with England and yet they ignored them.
They also tell us that there have been no changes in the manufacturing process, admitting the two products are identical, which virtually proves this to be a case of deliberate discrimination and amounts to racism against England. It is also unbelievable that Dairy Crest thinks there is no racism when they state in their annual report that they are the sole suppliers of milk to Marks & Spencer, and boast too, that all of their organic milk comes from farms in the West Country, yet Marks & Spencer can identify its milk source with England and the Cross of St. George, and the company that supplies it can’t. Marks and Spencer and their customers should sue this company for misrepresentation, and is again another sign of British racism and English discrimination.
Dairy Crest racism if not stopped will spread across other British companies and we advise all the people of England to think seriously about purchasing this companies products.




Down at the pub Marge says what we all think of Dairy Crest’s replies
from their stooges.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hj0VosOd4A

Fight against British Racism - Fight against English and England's Discrimination

What could be England's Last Wake up Call

When Margaret Thatcher was ousted by Europhiles for defending the United Kingdom against the introduction of EU regional policies proposed in the Maastricht Treaty, (subsequently signed by her successor) the signal was given to the EU that the United Kingdom was going to be a willing partner in sharing and relinquishing power to them, and accepted the possibility it could lead to the destabilisation of the nation state. Britain in Margaret Thatcher lost its last true British patriot.

Successive British governments and parliaments in their rush for Europe have corrupted the British identity with these regional policies, so much so that you could actually say they have encouraged it to the extent that Scotland and Wales now appear to want no more part of it. Given the power to look after their own domestic affairs with national parliament’s and doing so successively is it very surprising that they keep coming back for more power, and one of them, Scotland, now wants the option in a referendum to breakaway and decide its own future.

England has been kept in the dark since 1998 from the reality of adopting these EU regional policies and it is only now when the end of the United Kingdom could be in sight that the English are beginning to wake up. When in 1998 New Labour introduced these EU regional policies they did so by using our national boundaries and a process called asymmetrical devolution which denied England its rightful recognition, and it gave all other UK constituent nations except England a parliament. For the first time in 300 years the separate nations of the UK were given the power to discriminate against each other, and England without a parliament was not and is still not able to fight back. We have seen the results of discrimination manifest themselves in the differing costs of student fees, access to prescription drugs, care for the elderly etc, etc, each time the cost being to the disadvantage of the English tax payer. It also made it impossible anymore for British political party’s to put out a manifesto that would apply across the whole of the UK, and although they try to make it appear so by calling one British they can’t mask their separate manifestos for Scotland and Wales. How long can the United Kingdom survive in its present form anyway when certain parts get better benefits than others, and English rights to those benefits are denied by British MP’s, over 100 of  whom are from Scotland and Wales whose countries it is that get them. We must not forget either why the British have to deny England its political existence, it’s so that they can use it as a cash cow to bolster their own identity at home and abroad, and how hypocritical then that they are spending billions of pounds of our money doing it while at the same time they have continued to sign over their identity to Europe. If the British had any intention of saving the last of their empire they would have been talking to all of the UK nations about federalism before and after signing Maastricht and at least before any Scottish referendum that could signal the end of it. The importance of England gaining a parliament to protect itself and its assets in the circumstances can not be over stressed; if Scotland becomes independent the British Empire will be over. (FACT) If the British after want to retain their now defunct UK identity and power over England by denying us a parliament they will have to make us in England take on all of Scotland’s UK debts, which could put a debt of between £20,000 and £30,000 on the head of every English tax payer.

It will be a sad and costly day for us all if Scotland brings the United Kingdom to an end, and let us remember the FACT that the separate kingdoms were those of England and Scotland which became one in 1707 and that Wales and Ireland played no part in it. (Wales had been part of England since 1536)

Most of all let us not forget that none of this could have come about if the New Labour Blair government had not repealed all of the Treason Acts from 1770 onwards from British Law.

                                                                                                                           STANO

IS GATS DICTATING ENGLAND’S DOMESTIC POLICIES

Ignored by British Devolution Policies England is out on a limb when it comes to defending itself against the threat of Corporate Globalisation. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) treaty signed by World Trade Organisation (WTO) countries is liberalising services within nation states and England without representation has had no voice to prevent the nation’s assets being opened up to multinational companies for exploitation. Under this agreement members have to state what they will enter under GATS and what in other member states they would like to see liberalised; it is about time the people of England were told what requests of liberalisation has been made on our country and its Domestic Policies by other WTO members and what the UK British Government made on other countries. It has been said that over 150 service sectors could be opened up to competition including education, health and postal services which we know already have, and according to reports the US has predictably made sweeping demands. What appears on the outset to have been a merely trade agreement is becoming anything but, and from all appearances it now seems to be an agreement to allow rich multinational companies to move in on all of our country’s assets. It’s not been long ago since we heard that the British Government was proposing to sell off England’s forests, so the question is, has the government decided these options or were they decided for them because of the said so called free trade agreement? Without its own parliament it is only England that has no voice and separate representation when these agreements are drawn up, and it’s about time the English realised this fact before this green and pleasant land of ours is ours no more.    

BBC Racism shames British Political Parties

Last week the BBC said they thought the Words English and British were irritating so they preferred to promote Scotland and Scottish. This week we find the BBC is going one step further in showing their contempt for England and the English by starting to use a system that lets them award contracts to companies that would guarantee to employ staff from Scotland at the expense of English staff who they would replace.


It has been reported in the Times that English members of the crew producing the world snooker championship in Sheffield for the BBC lost their jobs because they came from England. Under a system introduced by the BBC that favoured staff being employed from North of the Border the company IMG was forced under breach of contract to employ people from Scotland. Workers from Scotland were sent to England and put up in hotels while specialists who had produced the two week tournament for several years were told they could not have the work. Apparently the BBC also used to employ local students as runners to make tea etc. but the company is now bringing down people from Scotland and paying in turn for them to stay in expensive hotel rooms.



This is an utter disgrace and had it have been the other way round Alex would be banging on the door of No 10 Downing Street

BBC Complaint Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363

While listening to Formula One on 5 live one of our members got fed up with the presenter emphasising the nationality of the driver Di Resta because Scotland and “the Scot” was screamed out every time Di Resta passed, but Button and Hamilton’s English identity was never mentioned once during the broadcast. On occasions he referred to them as the “Brits” the racist remark made against us English by the British to deny us our identity. The member complained to the BBC and pointed out the fact that if the United Kingdom still existed which the British keep telling us the English it does, then aren’t all the people of that Kingdom supposed to be “Brits” ;if the BBC and their presenters think not then that is up to them, but it is racist of the BBC and their presenters to deny one nation of that Kingdom their separate identity while recognising the other during any broadcasts.



Here is the e-mailed replies



Dear Mr JUSTICE

> Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363

> Thanks for contacting us about 5 Live Formula One

broadcast on BBC Radio 5 live on 22 April.

> I understand you felt it was biased of James Allen to refer to Paul di

Resta as 'Scottish' several times yet fail to use the terms 'British' or

'English' in reference to drivers such as Lewis Hamilton and Jenson

Button.

> As listeners can be irritated by the use of 'English' or 'British', we

try to keep this to a minimum. Morever, we can assure you that there is

no anti-English agenda at the BBC.

> However, I appreciate your frustration that you felt James Allen was

biased against the use of the terms 'English' and 'British' and so

please be assured your complaint will be added to our audience log, a

daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC

staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers

and other senior managers.

> The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape

decisions about future programming and content.

> Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

> Kind Regards

> Ryan Burroughs

> BBC Complaints

> www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

 NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored.

You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact

us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.





Dear Mr Burroughs

> Thank you for your reply about "5 Formula One" and James Allen's bias

towards England .

> I am afraid your statement that listeners can be irritated by using

English or British says it all, my guess it would be about the word

English that is the rub!

> WHAT listeners are irritated by the word English?? So any other

national name can be mentioned without fear or favour, the mind boggles.

> If this is a fact and your listeners are so upset by England being

mentioned a warning should be given before each program that words may

be used to upset the listener,

> If you had sent a letter like this to any other nationality but an

Englishman you would have had a "ism" case on your hands.

> This Englishman is not amused and it confirms every thing I have

thought about the BBC for years.

> Regards

> Henry Justice

We ask all our members to complain to all media sources that are trying to deny us our identity