Dairy Crest Response

Call me Dave has hired a Looby Loo shrink to run psychometric tests on MP’s, the Campaign for an English Parliament suggests that Dairy Crest do the same and run a similar test on its PR and advertising departments. Perhaps both will then come to the same conclusion and realise that these people can only fool all of the people some of the time, and not all of the people all of the time.
We have had a reply from Dairy Crest on our complaint about the changing of identity of their Country Life butter product, from its original English Label to a British Label, and they tell us that people have requested this?
No they have not, when this company with its French interests recently acquired 100% of the Country Life Label they could not wait to shove it in our English faces and have been determined to ignore its English connection.
We have asked who these people are? and pointed out to them that we too had asked the people, in two Mori polls, one ICM poll, and a BBC poll across England, and these had shown that 68% of the population of our country wanted to be identified with England and yet they ignored them.
They also tell us that there have been no changes in the manufacturing process, admitting the two products are identical, which virtually proves this to be a case of deliberate discrimination and amounts to racism against England. It is also unbelievable that Dairy Crest thinks there is no racism when they state in their annual report that they are the sole suppliers of milk to Marks & Spencer, and boast too, that all of their organic milk comes from farms in the West Country, yet Marks & Spencer can identify its milk source with England and the Cross of St. George, and the company that supplies it can’t. Marks and Spencer and their customers should sue this company for misrepresentation, and is again another sign of British racism and English discrimination.
Dairy Crest racism if not stopped will spread across other British companies and we advise all the people of England to think seriously about purchasing this companies products.




Down at the pub Marge says what we all think of Dairy Crest’s replies
from their stooges.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hj0VosOd4A

Fight against British Racism - Fight against English and England's Discrimination

What could be England's Last Wake up Call

When Margaret Thatcher was ousted by Europhiles for defending the United Kingdom against the introduction of EU regional policies proposed in the Maastricht Treaty, (subsequently signed by her successor) the signal was given to the EU that the United Kingdom was going to be a willing partner in sharing and relinquishing power to them, and accepted the possibility it could lead to the destabilisation of the nation state. Britain in Margaret Thatcher lost its last true British patriot.

Successive British governments and parliaments in their rush for Europe have corrupted the British identity with these regional policies, so much so that you could actually say they have encouraged it to the extent that Scotland and Wales now appear to want no more part of it. Given the power to look after their own domestic affairs with national parliament’s and doing so successively is it very surprising that they keep coming back for more power, and one of them, Scotland, now wants the option in a referendum to breakaway and decide its own future.

England has been kept in the dark since 1998 from the reality of adopting these EU regional policies and it is only now when the end of the United Kingdom could be in sight that the English are beginning to wake up. When in 1998 New Labour introduced these EU regional policies they did so by using our national boundaries and a process called asymmetrical devolution which denied England its rightful recognition, and it gave all other UK constituent nations except England a parliament. For the first time in 300 years the separate nations of the UK were given the power to discriminate against each other, and England without a parliament was not and is still not able to fight back. We have seen the results of discrimination manifest themselves in the differing costs of student fees, access to prescription drugs, care for the elderly etc, etc, each time the cost being to the disadvantage of the English tax payer. It also made it impossible anymore for British political party’s to put out a manifesto that would apply across the whole of the UK, and although they try to make it appear so by calling one British they can’t mask their separate manifestos for Scotland and Wales. How long can the United Kingdom survive in its present form anyway when certain parts get better benefits than others, and English rights to those benefits are denied by British MP’s, over 100 of  whom are from Scotland and Wales whose countries it is that get them. We must not forget either why the British have to deny England its political existence, it’s so that they can use it as a cash cow to bolster their own identity at home and abroad, and how hypocritical then that they are spending billions of pounds of our money doing it while at the same time they have continued to sign over their identity to Europe. If the British had any intention of saving the last of their empire they would have been talking to all of the UK nations about federalism before and after signing Maastricht and at least before any Scottish referendum that could signal the end of it. The importance of England gaining a parliament to protect itself and its assets in the circumstances can not be over stressed; if Scotland becomes independent the British Empire will be over. (FACT) If the British after want to retain their now defunct UK identity and power over England by denying us a parliament they will have to make us in England take on all of Scotland’s UK debts, which could put a debt of between £20,000 and £30,000 on the head of every English tax payer.

It will be a sad and costly day for us all if Scotland brings the United Kingdom to an end, and let us remember the FACT that the separate kingdoms were those of England and Scotland which became one in 1707 and that Wales and Ireland played no part in it. (Wales had been part of England since 1536)

Most of all let us not forget that none of this could have come about if the New Labour Blair government had not repealed all of the Treason Acts from 1770 onwards from British Law.

                                                                                                                           STANO

IS GATS DICTATING ENGLAND’S DOMESTIC POLICIES

Ignored by British Devolution Policies England is out on a limb when it comes to defending itself against the threat of Corporate Globalisation. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) treaty signed by World Trade Organisation (WTO) countries is liberalising services within nation states and England without representation has had no voice to prevent the nation’s assets being opened up to multinational companies for exploitation. Under this agreement members have to state what they will enter under GATS and what in other member states they would like to see liberalised; it is about time the people of England were told what requests of liberalisation has been made on our country and its Domestic Policies by other WTO members and what the UK British Government made on other countries. It has been said that over 150 service sectors could be opened up to competition including education, health and postal services which we know already have, and according to reports the US has predictably made sweeping demands. What appears on the outset to have been a merely trade agreement is becoming anything but, and from all appearances it now seems to be an agreement to allow rich multinational companies to move in on all of our country’s assets. It’s not been long ago since we heard that the British Government was proposing to sell off England’s forests, so the question is, has the government decided these options or were they decided for them because of the said so called free trade agreement? Without its own parliament it is only England that has no voice and separate representation when these agreements are drawn up, and it’s about time the English realised this fact before this green and pleasant land of ours is ours no more.    

BBC Racism shames British Political Parties

Last week the BBC said they thought the Words English and British were irritating so they preferred to promote Scotland and Scottish. This week we find the BBC is going one step further in showing their contempt for England and the English by starting to use a system that lets them award contracts to companies that would guarantee to employ staff from Scotland at the expense of English staff who they would replace.


It has been reported in the Times that English members of the crew producing the world snooker championship in Sheffield for the BBC lost their jobs because they came from England. Under a system introduced by the BBC that favoured staff being employed from North of the Border the company IMG was forced under breach of contract to employ people from Scotland. Workers from Scotland were sent to England and put up in hotels while specialists who had produced the two week tournament for several years were told they could not have the work. Apparently the BBC also used to employ local students as runners to make tea etc. but the company is now bringing down people from Scotland and paying in turn for them to stay in expensive hotel rooms.



This is an utter disgrace and had it have been the other way round Alex would be banging on the door of No 10 Downing Street

BBC Complaint Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363

While listening to Formula One on 5 live one of our members got fed up with the presenter emphasising the nationality of the driver Di Resta because Scotland and “the Scot” was screamed out every time Di Resta passed, but Button and Hamilton’s English identity was never mentioned once during the broadcast. On occasions he referred to them as the “Brits” the racist remark made against us English by the British to deny us our identity. The member complained to the BBC and pointed out the fact that if the United Kingdom still existed which the British keep telling us the English it does, then aren’t all the people of that Kingdom supposed to be “Brits” ;if the BBC and their presenters think not then that is up to them, but it is racist of the BBC and their presenters to deny one nation of that Kingdom their separate identity while recognising the other during any broadcasts.



Here is the e-mailed replies



Dear Mr JUSTICE

> Reference CAS-1421230-3Y5363

> Thanks for contacting us about 5 Live Formula One

broadcast on BBC Radio 5 live on 22 April.

> I understand you felt it was biased of James Allen to refer to Paul di

Resta as 'Scottish' several times yet fail to use the terms 'British' or

'English' in reference to drivers such as Lewis Hamilton and Jenson

Button.

> As listeners can be irritated by the use of 'English' or 'British', we

try to keep this to a minimum. Morever, we can assure you that there is

no anti-English agenda at the BBC.

> However, I appreciate your frustration that you felt James Allen was

biased against the use of the terms 'English' and 'British' and so

please be assured your complaint will be added to our audience log, a

daily report of audience feedback that's made available to many BBC

staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers

and other senior managers.

> The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape

decisions about future programming and content.

> Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.

> Kind Regards

> Ryan Burroughs

> BBC Complaints

> www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

 NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored.

You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact

us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.





Dear Mr Burroughs

> Thank you for your reply about "5 Formula One" and James Allen's bias

towards England .

> I am afraid your statement that listeners can be irritated by using

English or British says it all, my guess it would be about the word

English that is the rub!

> WHAT listeners are irritated by the word English?? So any other

national name can be mentioned without fear or favour, the mind boggles.

> If this is a fact and your listeners are so upset by England being

mentioned a warning should be given before each program that words may

be used to upset the listener,

> If you had sent a letter like this to any other nationality but an

Englishman you would have had a "ism" case on your hands.

> This Englishman is not amused and it confirms every thing I have

thought about the BBC for years.

> Regards

> Henry Justice

We ask all our members to complain to all media sources that are trying to deny us our identity

English Riots

Over the last few days the people of England have seen a recently discredited and corrupted British police force stand by and leave English businesses in nearly all of their major cities including England’s capital city London to the mercy of rampaging mobs. Forced by the police to stand by and watch as their businesses and homes were ransacked and set on fire the English were reduced to taking photographs, with any vigilantly effort to stop the outrage being seen as a violation. As English businesses and livelihoods were destroyed by children as young as 7 and 10 years old and with the whole of the country going into economic meltdown, England’s British MPs like Nero fiddled and enjoyed their excesses on one of their many holidays well away from the trouble.
But in one (not insignificant) respect the BBC has at last been compelled to tell the truth. The riots (not protests) are English, not British or UK riots: London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham, Bristol and Gloucester are indeed English not Scottish, Welsh or Irish cities. We must at least thank the rioters together with the incompetent British politicians and police for putting England back on the map, and since the BBC has suddenly got a taste for the truth, perhaps we can start adding the following terms to the BBC lexicon (and, who knows, that Old Etonian David Cameron may follow suit). Thus:
1. England’s forests the British want to sell
2. England’s people who pay full university fees.
3. England’s people who pay prescription charges.
4 England’s NHS that denies patients Drugs given free to the Scots, Welsh and Irish
5. England’s countryside the British want to concrete over
6 England’s people that are forced to pay Hospital Car parking charges and Bridge tolls
7. It’s the English AS WELL as the Irish, Scottish and Welsh dead in Afghanistan.
8. It’s the English AS WELL as the Irish, Scottish and Welsh youths without arms and legs, having had them blown off in Afghanistan.
Let us add:
1. British bombs on Libyan civilians.
2. British bankers.
3. British MPs fiddling on expenses.
4. British PMs inviting Rupert Murdoch to Downing Street through the back door.
5. British parliament.
6. Scottish parliament.
7. Welsh assembly.
8. Northern Ireland assembly.

No wonder we have had riots in England when the whole British establishment is not only being perceived has being corrupt but also being proved to be so, and the reason is that they no longer have respect for the sovereignty of our nation. Thus the pusillanimous Philip Hammond, Minister of Transport, awards a contract for railway carriages to Germany and in the process adds to the deprivation and misery of Derby (England) in the midst of a recession. Then they sell our hard-won freedom to Brussels. Then they sell our football clubs (the symbol of a once precious English working-class culture) to foreign owners, foreign managers, foreign players and foreign agents. Then they set out to sell the Port of Dover our English forests and wish to destroy the English countryside by giving count blanch planning permission for concreting over England’s green belt and the building of an unnecessary High Speed line from London to Birmingham (perhaps to enable the rioters in these cities to co-ordinate their efforts more speedily). Then they abandon the national defences (Ark Royal, harrier jump jets, etc.) whilst lavishing billions on the Olympic Games and foreign aid. Then they choose New Zealanders and South Africans instead of Englishmen in our rugby and cricket teams. Then they appoint Swedish and Italian managers to run our football team. Then they insist on the singing of British anthems instead of English anthems for English teams (even when playing the Scots and the Welsh). Then England is forced to play in grey against West Germany and Australia and black against Wales instead of the white or red of England. Then they disbar the English poor from Oxford and Cambridge by the imposition of huge fees. Then they impose prescription charges on the English poor. Then they refuse a parliament to the English and stuff Westminster with Brits. In other words, they have sold our once great country (England) to foreigners and foreign interest groups. Can they really be surprised when England’s capital city is in flames?
What a reward indeed for the heroes of 1939-1945.
It is time for the long-suffering English to call a halt to this madness. We (the English) must seek clever, non-violent ways of rising up against the British oppressor in an ENGLISH SPRING.
The first thing to do is to repudiate the British anthem for England and for goodness sake, why cannot these rugby and football supporters sing some English songs to match the Welsh and Scottish songs of their supporters, and why cannot England teams play in the colours of England and that is, for the benefit of the ignoramuses red and white, and lets all stand up and fight for a St. George’s Day public holiday.
There must surely be a positive impact engendered by the pride that is encouraged in Welsh and Scottish society by their respective assembly and parliament, the teaching of their history and not being looked down on because they are from these nations. In contrast one is not allowed to be proud of England and being English as this is deemed to imply some form of racism, as does displaying England’s flag. England’s history has been replaced with a false British interpretation so there is no respect for the society in which we live and no value placed on our heritage. Our children feel they do not belong anymore and have no place in this multicultural society watching as they do the British dismantle and sell off their sovereignty and deny them their identity, is it any wonder they look for peers amongst the gangs on our streets.
It did not need the speaker in the House of Commons to decide if these riots applied to England only as it was plainly obvious to everybody, everybody that is except the British Prime Minister David Cameron who recalled the entire British Parliament. This was England’s business only so why should he have had to recall the MPs from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, was it to give them a reason to scoff over our troubles as our police force had to be backed up by their own mercenaries, or was it to encourage the suggestion England gets one from the U.S.A.

English Patriot

Please make sure you sign up to the petition

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/78

DECMS – Deny English Community Mainstream Support

The Department of Culture, Media and Sport like every department and institution the British have set up to look after English interests has one thing in common with all others, a clear mandate and objective to deny the English community mainstream support, and also like all others are allowed to treat England with contempt, denying even that the departments are English only departments, preferring to hide this fact under UK or British letterheads, so I have added the ‘E’ for them. It seems that the Coalition Government in charge of this department is no wiser than New Labour on this subject so I will remind them again that these issues are devolved to the nations, so they have no jurisdiction to legally demand other nation compliance.

It is possible to write a book on the way each aspect of this department denies England and its English Community support, but I prefer for the moment to comment on the one that is making headlines.
Sport

The British realise that the national identity of its UK nations is firmly wrapped up in this department and none at least, from the publics perception greater than that revolving around a nations sporting activity, and in particular football. This national patriotism was encouraged and actually seen to be beneficial in sustaining the United Kingdom’s sovereignty before the British headed for Europe, then after instigating its devolution policies the British have realised that home nation loyalty comes at a price and are now attempting to overcome a threat of their own creation, a mounting rise in nationalism.

It was not long after the London bid for the Olympic Games and its success that it was announced by the then Olympic Committee that Teams GB would be entered into the Olympic Football Tournament. From the offset this created a controversy across the United Kingdom’s national football associations who declared in block that they would not support such a team, because quite rightly they feared that playing in an international competition under a GB banner would jeopardise their own national team identities, and their places in future international competitions. At this time I warned that the FA, the association that is supposed to be representing England’s interest, but isn’t even allowed to state that fact (note again the missing ‘E’) else it would put it into conflict with British interests, would agree to put out an all England team if that scenario endured, thus committing England and only England to carry their GB banner in all future competitions. Now that the Olympic Games are almost upon us the FA, the British not English organisation have agreed with what I said then and they are claiming quite rightly that they have that legal responsibility to obey their masters, so the FA - f------ A------ will bow to demands being asked of them to support the British Olympic Organisation and will be preparing if necessary to do just that.

The FA will put out an initial list of players that includes some from other UK national organisations and pretend to care when none of them accept the offer, and it’s odds on none will. What players are prepared to become traitors to their own nation and accept the offer, I will tell you who, it wont be any from the minor nations, it will the British who hide under the English shirt who will be the traitors, led by that well thought of supposed English Icon David Beckham that’s who.
The question is, if it happens and it will –

WHAT ARE YOU THE ENGLISH GOING TO DO ABOUT IT
A suggestion would be perhaps to go back to the original structure of playing GB Amateur Teams in Olympic competitions.

For the record and for those who have not read the previous pages of the West Midland Blog, at the last Olympic Games England won more Gold medals than it had done at any since the games began, and yet not one medal was accredited to England and the English, only to British, Scottish, Welsh and Irish competitors, who were also allowed to hold their own separate national celebrations when they arrived home.

ENGLAND MUST SPEAK UP NOW AND FIGHT BRITISH DISCRIMINATION

England is now all but a map reference having -

NO Parliament - NO Nation - NO Voice - NO Anthem